Taunts/De-Aggro's

[Kooli]

<p>I don't understand the purpose, point, or reasoning behind turning Taunts into De-Aggro's while in Offensive stance.</p><p>Probably moreso than any other tank class, the Zerker relies heavily on DPS to maintain aggro.  So my Zerker spends alot of time in Offensive stance.  Pallies had Amends, SK's had Deathmarch, Guardians had Reinforce...Zerkers just DPS'd.  I relied heavily on the 2 regular Taunts (use Insolence at yer own risk!)  and Rescue in case there was a rip.</p><p>Now you're tellin' me that I gotta choose between Offensive stance and Taunts...but I can't have both???</p><p>Huh?</p><p>Why?</p><p>So now I get to have issues keepin' aggro in both Stances instead of just one?</p><p>This makes me sad.</p><p>Don't make me sad!</p>

[RafaelSmith]

<p>I also do not understand turning taunts into de-aggro when in O stance....they could have achieved the same negatives and positives to the stances without having to toggle aggro to be de-aggro.</p><p>If these changes go live the only time a fighter will ever be in O stance is soloing...because in every other situation its to the benifit of the group or raid that secondary fighters ride as high on the hate list as possible. </p><p>They should rename the stances...O Stance = Solo Stance....D Stance = Group/Raid Stance.</p><p>Really stupid change.</p>

[Kiara]

<p>There's already a <a href="http://forums.station.sony.com/eq2/posts/list.m?topic_id=440496" target="_blank">thread</a> about this in this very forum.  Can we please try to keep the feedback in a few key threads?</p><p>Thank you much!!</p>