74 master 2 choice and aa question

[Lunah]

<p>I am  curious as to which master 2 other templars took at 74. Also if I am not raiding is it worth it to throw points into increased sanctuary? Currently I have blessing and working down smites line, just seems a lot of wasted points to get increased sanctuary is all. Thanks for any advice!</p>

[Filroden]

<p>I took our buff as my master 2 option but I had the master 1 for the single-target nuke and our reactive debuff. However, I raid a lot so extra health and mitigation > other options.</p><p>If you don't raid I would suggest the nuke until you find a master and then the buff.</p><p>As to AAs, if you don't raid then get some of the compliances such as the extended stun and daze (both of which can be group savers) and the reduced recast on your deaggro (again, a group saver on a bad pull where you get aggro).</p>

[Antryg Mistrose]

<p>Choices are:</p><ol><li>12 extra hp for the group (over master 1) - about 0.1%.  and 37 extra mitigation to magic/divine/mental attacks</li><li>A nuke</li><li>An encounter nuke</li><li>Less resists and bigger raid wide heal for the only debuff we have that helps our other spells land, and that I cast first in every fight.</li></ol><p>Guess which I took.</p>

[JenarieII]

<p>I went with Mark also. </p><p>The difference between the M1 and M2 buff is so tiny it doesn't seem worthwhile to me.  Even with AIII it is a small difference.</p>

[rtoub]

<p>I took the buff until I got a master drop then respeced to Mark.  I still have never seen a mark master drop or appear on broker.</p>

[Giliad]

<p>I had Mark drop the first week of ROK.  So I took Symbol.  If I can get the symbol master sometime soon might switch to nukes.  Eventually when I have all 4 mastered I will prolly switch to mark.</p>