Not an issue... Just curious

[dancemice]

<p>What are the differances if any between high quality and warning, This may lock your computer up setting (Super high quality) Which i can actually run and play at.</p><p>Personally I'm not seeing much of a differance.</p><p>Is it possible to list some differances between the various levels of settings </p><p>(superior motive here... So when i blog about display and perfomance, i can actually discribe the differances other then high performance is bleh blurry and high quality gives shadows and crisp display...)</p><p>-B-</p>

[Senrow]

high quality is good but the performance is a bit worse.super high quality is real life looking but very bad performance.may be lag in every step u take.u have been warned.

[thephantomposter]

Just tried this myself, it dropped my frame rate right down but man o man, at least with my video card, wow! The detail was amazing!

[vochore]

ya to run at max you basicly need a cpu on steroids

[dancemice]

<p>heh, i can do about 110 fps on best performance and it varies between 10 and 30 on super high quality.</p><p>Guess i'll have to line up somewhere and take a series of pictures on the different settings to show graphic differances in my blog.</p><p>-B-</p>