Ancient Dreadscale Greaves (rant)

[Fungie]

<p>Change Dreadscale Greaves (and Ancient Dreadscale Greaves) to 2-3k hp ward and make them guard/zerker usable again.  That is completely unfair to anyone who didn't get the ADGs in time.  Personally, my cable modem went bad, and I could not install RoK for 10 days after release because it wouldn't download properly.</p><p>You're also screwing (can't come up with any cleaner word while still accurately portratying reality) anyone who had difficulty getting RoK to work because of programming flaws or incompatiblity.  Is it really fair to them that RoK didn't work on their computer?  Not only do they have to deal with the hassle of contacting tech support and spending hours (days/weeks) to get RoK to work, but they missed out on gear that they'll never be able to get again.  "Welcome to the RoK party... you're late!  Hope you didn't want the best leg items from the entire expansion, loser!" seems like a horrible modus operandi.  </p><p>You had no problem nerfing Sallet of the Reet Knight twice, which to be honest with you is ok with me because I still think it's a very good helmet, but instead of taking the same approach to ADGs, you made the game completely unfair to those who did not / could not get a pair.  Those who got a pair of ADGs will forever (or at least for RoK and probably even after the next expansion) be better than those who did not.  If they're so unfair, why do you let some people still have them?</p>

[LygerT]

cause the devs don't care

[Fungie]

<cite>Lyger@Mistmoore wrote:</cite><blockquote>cause the devs don't care</blockquote><p>That's a rather defeatist attitude.</p><p>No doubt all of the whining that goes on makes them rather numb to legitimate complaints, so it's not entirely the fault of the devs.  The solution they came up with, I suppose, is entirely their fault, but the fact that their error hasn't been corrected is partially the fault of those who throw fits over things that simply do not need to be fixed, throw fits only when something benefits/hurts them, etc.</p>

[LygerT]

<p>do i think its fair they left the attuned sets alone? no</p><p>do i think its fair they removed fighters from them? no</p><p>do i think its fair they should take them away from those who may have bought or farmed them? no</p><p>what they could have easily done was nerf down the proc and leave well enough alone instead of screwing us out of them completely. </p><p>you're right that i think they are numb to complaints now, which is why i silently complain to myself most of the time rather than waste my breath in their direction. whats done is done and i dont think will be changed once a change has already been made. human nature is to not admit you were wrong, maybe once but twice would make you out to be a fool and not something i think they want to take upon themselves, rather take the brunt from the ones affected. </p>

[Fungie]

<p>It has been said that anger is a gift.  Get angry about it.  Make them ban you from the forums for spamming about it.</p><p>Heck, as far as I know, I'm the guy who /feedback'd that they should give us extra AAs in each tree for RoK... maybe they'll agree with this suggestion too. <img src="/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" />  If they don't, I plan on letting them know how I feel about it.  </p>

[LygerT]

i tried that already and a mod accused me of inticing personal attacks.. how can you make personal attacks when there is a pg13 word filter on the forum?

[Fungie]

<p>I see you folks at SoE have decided the chardok blue shiny belt was too strong, so you nerfed it... and yet you leave ADG's in the game... completely untouched. </p><p>That type of stupidity lies somewhere far beyond my ability to describe it.</p>