what group with no healer would work best in pvp

[wellehad0]

<p>ok me and two other people are all starting new toons now that the new race is out.. we all have played the healer roles before and we are all sick of being a druid..</p><p>right now we are planning on this type of group</p><p> paly... monk... ranger....  </p><p>we figure two fighters would be able to taunt long so that they ranger can always be in bow range...</p><p>we have also thought about instead of a pally maybe a dirge or troub but only thing about that is then th emonk would have to be the main tank...</p><p>we could also have temp... monk... ranger..</p><p>any ideas if this would do since we almost always group for everything</p>

[G1Joe]

1 swash 1 lock 4 pally might be ok

[wellehad0]

<p>lol keep in mind we are hardcore about the pvp thing and will all be m1 and the best gear we can get for our lvl's imnot asking for wich group would be the most deadly or kill the fastest.. just tring not to make a doomed group no matter what kind of gear we have.... we already have a ranger wich does not have as good of track as ranger but that group runspeed buff is a must need so that when we do get others to join we dont have to wait up for people.... also i have seen some great twinked pallys and monks..  my friend is already set on ranger i am already set on monk its the other guy who really wants to be another fighter.. rofl maybe i can trik him into being a guard</p>

[Necodem]

<p>1 illu all other warlocks</p><p> or full rangers !</p>

[Norrsken]

Problem with no healer groups is that they pretty much invariably lose to groups with a few well played healers along. And druids are not the only good pvp healers tbh. <img src="/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" />

[Xzerius]

<p>IMO.  Since it seems you are Q side I would say this as a threesome.</p><p>Pally, Swashy, Warlock</p>

[Bozidar]

<p>2 tanks is a bad idea.  drop the monk, keep the pally (he can group heal, i believe).</p><p>since you're locked in on ranger it seems, go with pally, ranger, swash.  </p><p>if you don't like the swash, i'd suggest maybe an illusionist.  if you can't heal, the least you can do is CC them to death.</p>

[WasFycksir]

<p>I think a 3 man group, consisting of a scout type, and two summoners would be a blast.</p><p>You could vary your AA specs and be very well rounded.</p><p>You could go all out dps or mix it up.  The summoners could even spec-up some ok healing ability for emergencies.</p><p>You would have 5 targets that you opponents would have to deal with, not easy, even with crappy tank pet taunts we have to deal with.  </p>

[Elephanton]

<cite>Darkhain@Venekor wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>1 illu all other warlocks</p></blockquote>This is exactly what I always recommend.

[greenmantle]

6 furies? <img src="/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /> runs

[Elephanton]

<cite>greenmantle wrote:</cite><blockquote>6 furies? <img src="/eq2/images/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY<img src=" width="15" height="15" />" width="15" height="15">runs</blockquote><p>6 furies is worst group you could possibly create due to healing spells conflict (only one healing spell can be active at the same time if healer class is the same, so if 1 fury throws group HOT, other furies' group HOTs would not take effect until the first one expires).</p>

[Falkur]

Troub, Illy, Warlock Troub-track and buff Illy- group mezzwarlock destroy mezzed debuffed group

[Elephanton]

<cite>Falkur wrote:</cite><blockquote>warlock destroy mezzed debuffed group </blockquote>sorry to say but mezz prevents AOE

[Darkor]

<p>Paladin/monk, Swashbuckler/ranger, Warlock/illusionist</p><p>Pick your combos, they all rule.</p>

[Pletia]

I was exiled before, and we got a PvP group together one night.. Monk, Swash, Brigand, Assassin, Ranger.. we were just destroying every group we saw.. was fun. <img src="http://forums.station.sony.com/eq2/images/smilies/283a16da79f3aa23fe1025c96295f04f.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" width="15" height="15" />

[mattmandude]

Personally I'd go with three monks, or 2 monks and a warlock <img src="/smilies/69934afc394145350659cd7add244ca9.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" />

[Tatate]

3 Wizards and 3 Warlocks all Battlemage spec'd

[Falkur]

<cite>ElephantonRU wrote:</cite><blockquote><cite>Falkur wrote:</cite><blockquote>warlock destroy mezzed debuffed group </blockquote>sorry to say but mezz prevents AOE</blockquote>yeah No [Removed for Content], except when the AOE is direct tbh, meaning more then likeyly the healer or MA will catch most the AOE while the others [Removed for Content] there and watch the poor [Removed for Content] die