PDA

View Full Version : Question about Warden vs Fury at lvl 32....


MajiinX
10-22-2007, 04:14 PM
Hey I'm currently leveling my Warden and I'm speced for melee right but I group alot and also have melee mystic so i'm looking to do something different. I want to go int line and master my nukes but I was curious how big is the difference in nuking as a fury and warden at lvl 32. And would it be viable to solo as well with nuking or should i just betray to fury? Thanks in advance.

Arielle Nightshade
10-22-2007, 07:35 PM
<p>Before you betray, consider why you wanted to be a mystic or warden in the first place - both are healers.   I'd choose which of the classes you are looking at are the better HEALERS for your playstyle.  Everything else is interesting and fun, but in the end, bottom line...that's what I think you need to look at to decide.</p><p>If you want a melee/dps class that can also heal - roll a monk, IMO.    Go with what the class does basically then decide the strength of the melee/CA/damage after that, is my advice.</p>

MajiinX
10-22-2007, 09:18 PM
Oh my overall goal is to heal, but I wanted to be able to have a good mix of soloing without hurting my power pool, hence why i wanted to spec for nukes, i was just curious how the warden nukes compared to fury.

Vysirez
11-24-2007, 04:36 AM
<p>I havent actually played either, but just looking at the class specific AAs, a Fury looks to be a better nuker then a Warden. All of the Warden AAs that are offensive are designed to make a melee warden, so thier EoF AA's will be mostly useless for a nuker. The only ones that would help are the root and snare buffs. </p><p>Looking at Fury AAs you have actual nuke boosts in addition to the root/snare buffs and other abilities. Plus from everything I have read the fury gets somewhat better nuke spells even without AAs, but I'm less sure about that.</p>