Greys attacking reds

[Zexxii]

<p>* It should now be easier to land spells on higher levels players in pvp. </p><p> Guess that is their response to all the discussions.</p>

[Bloodfa]

<p>Well, I'm glad that they fixed the glaring problems with twinked characters being able to overpower and destroy other players whom they should not be able to do more than a minor amount of .....</p><p>  .... they what?  </p><p>The exact opposite of what even the most twinked level lockers admit is a problem, they made .... <i>worse</i>?  Are you [Removed for Content] me?  What, now I've got to worry about guys 1/3 my level?  Maybe it's a typo.  Or they've got the White House interpreting the forums.</p>

[Magnis]

nahh  , its gotta be a typo.

[orehn]

/cheer I need more level 60 tokens tbh.  I jest, of course... <img src="/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" />

[shalom]

<p>Did I notice attackable greys not giving faction anymore?</p><p>I know they dont drop loot/fame/tokens....wondered if they still give faction.</p>

[Strums]

<p>I was attacked by a grey dreadnaught & a grey champ in SS.  I killed both of them, and got only faction...no fame.</p>

[Vilesummon]

<span style="font-size: small">I continue to be impressed with the improvement...from healers that can't cure to grays having even more of an advantage...I swear I have read forums and don't recall anyone saying they needed to tweak those things, but hey maybe I missed the "really dumb things I wish they would implement" thread.</span>

[dobanow]

Zexxii@Nagafen wrote: <blockquote><p>* It should now be easier to land spells on higher levels players in pvp. </p><p> Guess that is their response to all the discussions.</p></blockquote>Typo....its * It should now be easier to land spells in higher levels of pvp (t7 vs t7) or something to that effect

[Magius789]

Vilesummon@Venekor wrote: <blockquote><span style="font-size: small">I continue to be impressed with the improvement...from healers that can't cure to grays having even more of an advantage...I swear I have read forums and don't recall anyone saying they needed to tweak those things, but hey maybe I missed the <b><span style="color: #ff0000">"really dumb things I wish they would implement" thread.</span></b></span> </blockquote> Haha  <img src="/smilies/283a16da79f3aa23fe1025c96295f04f.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" />

[Shinnar]

<cite>Magius789 wrote:</cite><blockquote>Vilesummon@Venekor wrote: <blockquote><span style="font-size: small">I continue to be impressed with the improvement...from healers that can't cure to grays having even more of an advantage...I swear I have read forums and don't recall anyone saying they needed to tweak those things, but hey maybe I missed the <b><span style="color: #ff0000">"really dumb things I wish they would implement" thread.</span></b></span> </blockquote> Haha  <img src="/smilies/283a16da79f3aa23fe1025c96295f04f.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /></blockquote> You couldnt miss it. That is every second thread....

[Legiax]

<cite>Strums wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I was attacked by a grey dreadnaught & a grey champ in SS.  I killed both of them, and got only faction...no fame.</p></blockquote><p> I hope that wasnt Semper Fi =p</p><p>Myself and my g/f went on a killing spree of 70's last night, must of got ourselves around 10-15 70's, in 2v1's, 2v2's.. all good fun now with the new changes.</p>

[Eybietie]

Zexxii@Nagafen wrote: <blockquote><p>* It should now be easier to land spells on higher levels players in pvp. </p><p> Guess that is their response to all the discussions.</p></blockquote><p> anti lvl locker = owned.</p><p>[Removed for Content]</p>

[shalom]

Bloodfang@Nagafen wrote: <blockquote><p>Well, I'm glad that they fixed the glaring problems with twinked characters being able to overpower and destroy other players whom they should not be able to do more than a minor amount of .....</p><p>  .... they what?  </p><p>The exact opposite of what even the most twinked level lockers admit is a problem, they made .... <i>worse</i>?  Are you [I cannot control my vocabulary] me?  What, now I've got to worry about guys 1/3 my level?  Maybe it's a typo.  <span style="color: #ff0000">Or they've got the White House interpreting the forums</span>.</p></blockquote> ...imagining GW trying to choose AA lines...

[Ibunubi]

Vilesummon@Venekor wrote: <blockquote><span style="font-size: small">I continue to be impressed with the improvement...from healers that can't cure to grays having even more of an advantage...I swear I have read forums and don't recall anyone saying they needed to tweak those things, but hey maybe I missed the "really dumb things I wish they would implement" thread.</span> </blockquote><p>I suggested the recast on cures; however, I suggested a 1-2 second recast, which was grossly overdone with a 10 second recast. (A slap to the face and kick to the jewels).</p>

[Norrsken]

<cite>Ibunubi wrote:</cite><blockquote>Vilesummon@Venekor wrote: <blockquote><span style="font-size: small">I continue to be impressed with the improvement...from healers that can't cure to grays having even more of an advantage...I swear I have read forums and don't recall anyone saying they needed to tweak those things, but hey maybe I missed the "really dumb things I wish they would implement" thread.</span> </blockquote><p>I suggested the recast on cures; however, I suggested a 1-2 second recast, which was grossly overdone with a 10 second recast. (A slap to the face and kick to the jewels).</p></blockquote>And an atomic superwedgie. tbh, <5s would be ok. 10s? might be a bit over the top yah. <img src="/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" />