Harm Touch Hits you for 127

[lancekortesoja]

Man, I feel bad for who ever rolled an sk

[Norrsken]

<cite>lancekortesoja wrote:</cite><blockquote>Man, I feel bad for who ever rolled an sk</blockquote>the only question I have is, what level?

[CresentBlade]

Ulvhamne@Nagafen wrote: <blockquote><cite>lancekortesoja wrote:</cite><blockquote>Man, I feel bad for who ever rolled an sk</blockquote>the only question I have is, what level? </blockquote> That would still suck even at level 20 to see that amount of damage from a big hitter<img src="/smilies/385970365b8ed7503b4294502a458efa.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" />

[Norrsken]

<cite>CresentBlade wrote:</cite><blockquote>Ulvhamne@Nagafen wrote: <blockquote><cite>lancekortesoja wrote:</cite><blockquote>Man, I feel bad for who ever rolled an sk</blockquote>the only question I have is, what level? </blockquote> That would still suck even at level 20 to see that amount of damage from a big hitter<img src="/smilies/385970365b8ed7503b4294502a458efa.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /></blockquote>I've seen my HT do 250 on people at m1 in t3. Which is why I wonder about all these nerf HT threads.  Its basically people too lazy to get resists. But 127, in t7, would indicate broken resists, since they shouldnt mitigate more than 80%, and well, Im pretty sure that HT in t7 has a larger minimum hit than 600ish. <img src="/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" />

[Bozidar]

<p>in T7 the spell isn't called Harm Touch, so i'm assuming it's the lvl 20 spell.</p><p>more details around who the combatants are would be useful in this thread <img src="/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /></p><p>I can see a lvl 31 SK trying to HT a 38 dirge, defiler, or warlock and doing absolute crap damage even after debuffing.</p>

[Norrsken]

<cite>Bozidar wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>in T7 the spell isn't called Harm Touch, so i'm assuming it's the lvl 20 spell.</p><p>more details around who the combatants are would be useful in this thread <img src="/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /></p><p>I can see a lvl 31 SK trying to HT a 38 dirge, defiler, or warlock and doing absolute crap damage even after debuffing.</p></blockquote>People quite often refer to the while spell line as HT. And, HT on a necro with decent gear shouldnt be to horrible either. <img src="/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" />

[Bozidar]

Ulvhamne@Nagafen wrote: <blockquote><cite>Bozidar wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>in T7 the spell isn't called Harm Touch, so i'm assuming it's the lvl 20 spell.</p><p>more details around who the combatants are would be useful in this thread <img src="/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /></p><p>I can see a lvl 31 SK trying to HT a 38 dirge, defiler, or warlock and doing absolute crap damage even after debuffing.</p></blockquote>People quite often refer to the while spell line as HT. And, HT on a necro with decent gear shouldnt be to horrible either. <img src="/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /> </blockquote><p> yeah, i left out the necro, but tbh.. almost all Qs buff disease resists, so any smart Q with a level advantage should be able to mitigate much of it.</p><p>As for referring to the whole line... when someone says "Harm Touch hits you for 127", that's usually quoting a log from the game, not trying to say "Hey, some guy HT'd me for 127!".  Know what i mean?</p>

[Norrsken]

<cite>Bozidar wrote:</cite><blockquote>Ulvhamne@Nagafen wrote: <blockquote><cite>Bozidar wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>in T7 the spell isn't called Harm Touch, so i'm assuming it's the lvl 20 spell.</p><p>more details around who the combatants are would be useful in this thread <img src="/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /></p><p>I can see a lvl 31 SK trying to HT a 38 dirge, defiler, or warlock and doing absolute crap damage even after debuffing.</p></blockquote>People quite often refer to the while spell line as HT. And, HT on a necro with decent gear shouldnt be to horrible either. <img src="/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /> </blockquote><p> yeah, i left out the necro, but tbh.. almost all Qs buff disease resists, so any smart Q with a level advantage should be able to mitigate much of it.</p><p>As for referring to the whole line... when someone says "Harm Touch hits you for 127", that's usually quoting a log from the game, not trying to say "Hey, some guy HT'd me for 127!".  Know what i mean?</p></blockquote>Yup, but I've seen people quote it, rather than copy paste it, and instead of saying Pestilent touch hits YOU for Blaha, they sai Harm Touch hits you for Blaha.

[Elephanton]

<p>I've seen this before, reason is not resists (resists don't mitigate after EOF as they used to do before revamp). </p><p>To OP: if your foe had a ward of any kind, then HT damage will be shown reduced like that. In other words, if your HT hits for 3000, and 2500 damage will be absorbed by a ward, then it would log that HT damage was 500 (actual amount minus warded amount).</p>

[Magius789]

I've had my sniper shot crit for 128 dmg before! <img src="/smilies/e78feac27fa924c4d0ad6cf5819f3554.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" />  And my gear is all MC/Leg/Fabled with some decent str. when I use a potion.  I don't use it much anymore...

[lancekortesoja]

<cite>Magius789 wrote:</cite><blockquote>I've had my sniper shot crit for 128 dmg before! <img src="/smilies/e78feac27fa924c4d0ad6cf5819f3554.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" />  And my gear is all MC/Leg/Fabled with some decent str. when I use a potion.  I don't use it much anymore...</blockquote> sad... just sad