View Full Version : For a solo wizard, is there any reason to upgrade non-DD spell past Adept 1?
MrJekylls
05-17-2007, 01:30 PM
<p>From reading through posts here, my understanding is that a solo wizard basically relies on root, stun, and their big DD. That would imply to me that, for a solo wizard, they only really need to upgrade their big DD (and to a lesser extent their stun and root) beyond Adept 1.</p><p>Is this accurate, or am I missing something?</p><p>Thanks for your time. <img src="/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /></p>
SacDaddy420
05-17-2007, 02:35 PM
you are missing the fact that you will be MUCHO more successful as a solo'er with at least ad3 spells. Better nuke = quicker, safer kill. Die 100000 times because all your roots were resisted then come back here and ask this question
Wilko1981
05-17-2007, 07:31 PM
<span style="font-family: trebuchet ms,geneva">Enjoy your repair bill if that is your approach, agree with Sacs points</span> <img src="/smilies/283a16da79f3aa23fe1025c96295f04f.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" />
Mirander_1
05-17-2007, 07:41 PM
If you're a soloer, you want to upgrade these, at the least: All DD nukes (Ice Comet, Fireball, the mini-nuke) single- and group-roots stuns Your buffs things like DoTs, Icesheild, and Surge of Flames/Frigid Gift also have their place, but the above would be the minimum.
HaCkHaCkER
05-24-2007, 03:44 PM
<p>i agree, the most important upgrades are </p><p>1. roots, single and multi target 2. large DD, IC, BoF, etc... 3. then i would go with the damage shield 4. then buffs</p>
I'm a new player and i'm trying to figure out the difference between upgrading spells. Just looking at the damage variance between apprentice 1-3 spells it seems like a big waste to even upgrade the spell to 3. I don't know how this pertains to Adept or Master though. I guess I'm just totally lost about upgrading spells. =(
Mareth
06-01-2007, 07:52 PM
<cite>Ulao wrote:</cite><blockquote>I'm a new player and i'm trying to figure out the difference between upgrading spells. Just looking at the damage variance between apprentice 1-3 spells it seems like a big waste to even upgrade the spell to 3. I don't know how this pertains to Adept or Master though. I guess I'm just totally lost about upgrading spells. =( </blockquote>Just ignore apprentice 2-4, and go for adept1's if you're poor, adept 3 if you got the rares, and masters if you can afford them <img src="/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /> It's a huge upgrade from apprentice spells to adept, and so on.
Also don't just look at the damage, look at the resist rate.
Cakassis
06-02-2007, 02:06 PM
<p>For the person asking about the difference in spell levels...</p><p> The difference between each level of spell, App1, App2, etc is about 15% per level. The App2 is about 15% better than the App1. The App3 is 15% better than App2, and so on. This means the AD1 will do about 60% more damage than the App1 version of the same spell.</p>
vBulletin® v3.7.5, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.