Let the farming begin?

[Murchik]

<div><font color="#ccffcc">with this post today:</font></div><div> </div><div><strong><font color="#ffcc00">*** Desert of Flames ***</font></strong><em>- Items from the Poet's Palace that were previously labeled Fabled are now Legendary (though the items themselves have not changed).</em></div><div> </div><div><font color="#ccffcc">does it also mean that the items will loose no-drop tag?</font></div>

[Rhianni]

<div></div>I dont know where you have been but its been farmed plenty already

[Murchik]

<div></div><blockquote><hr>Rhianni wrote:<div></div>I dont know where you have been but its been farmed plenty already<hr></blockquote>this adds all the items that used to be no-drop to the pool.

[Magu]

<div><span><blockquote><hr>Murchik wrote:<div> </div><div><font color="#ccffcc">does it also mean that the items will loose no-drop tag?</font></div><hr></blockquote>First off, LOSE, not loose.Second, probably not. Fabled vs Legendary has no effect on NO-TRADE or any other tag.</span></div>

[Murchik]

<div></div><blockquote><hr>Magus` wrote:<div><span><blockquote><hr>Murchik wrote:<div> </div><div><font color="#ccffcc">does it also mean that the items will loose no-drop tag?</font></div><hr></blockquote>First off, LOSE, not loose.Second, probably not. Fabled vs Legendary has no effect on NO-TRADE or any other tag.</span></div><hr></blockquote><p>first off, whatever</p><p>second, if you have no idea, why even post?  go go post count?  shouldn't be surprised given your post reputation</p>

[Cuz]

<div></div><blockquote><hr>Murchik wrote:<div></div><blockquote><hr>Magus` wrote:<div><span><blockquote><hr>Murchik wrote:<div> </div><div><font color="#ccffcc">does it also mean that the items will loose no-drop tag?</font></div><hr></blockquote>First off, LOSE, not loose.Second, probably not. Fabled vs Legendary has no effect on NO-TRADE or any other tag.</span></div><hr></blockquote><p>first off, whatever</p><p>second, if you have no idea, why even post?  go go post count?  shouldn't be surprised given your post reputation</p><hr></blockquote>He is right in both cases though.

[Za]

<blockquote><hr>Murchik wrote:<div></div><blockquote><hr>Magus` wrote:<div><span><blockquote><hr>Murchik wrote:<div> </div><div><font color="#ccffcc">does it also mean that the items will loose no-drop tag?</font></div><hr></blockquote>First off, LOSE, not loose.Second, probably not. Fabled vs Legendary has no effect on NO-TRADE or any other tag.</span></div><hr></blockquote><p>first off, whatever</p><p>second, if you have no idea, why even post?  go go post count?  shouldn't be surprised given your post reputation</p><hr></blockquote>So who is it that has no idea? Who is it that made a post without any point?

[Murchik]

<div></div><blockquote><hr>Zald wrote:So who is it that has no idea? Who is it that made a post without any point?<hr></blockquote><p>my post was a question about tags on items, his post was an answer/statement (?) when he has no clue about what is the answer.</p><p>do you have an idea or point in your post?</p>

[Za]

OK, I'll explain it to you. NO!The legendary/fabled tag has NOTHING to do with drop/no drop.Thats is a deffinitive answer to your question. It doesn't mean that any 1 item that was no drop will or will not change flags, but I guarantee you they all didn't.So again, in case you still don't get it...You asked " does it also mean that the items will loose no-drop tag? "The answer NO, the two tags have absolutely NOTHING to do with one another...even if some item do have their drop flag changed, the fabled/legendary flag had NOTHING to do with it... and you spelled lose wrong.

[Xaana]

<div>The items from Poets Palace are still listed as " Lore No Trade." The only thing that has been changed is the Fabled to Legendary tag.  I know this for sure because I do play on test. </div><div> </div><div>Why do ppl refer to no trade items as no drop items?  Am I missing something or is it just a mistype?</div><div> </div>

[Chog]

<div></div><blockquote><hr>masburrito wrote:<div>The items from Poets Palace are still listed as " Lore No Trade." The only thing that has been changed is the Fabled to Legendary tag.  I know this for sure because I do play on test. </div><div> </div><div><font color="#ffff00">Why do ppl refer to no trade items as no drop items?  Am I missing something or is it just a mistype?</font></div><div> </div><hr></blockquote>More then likely an old EQ1 habit.

[Happyfunba]

<div></div><p>Agreed. EQlive actually employed both terms in the case of items being No Drop AND No Trade. I think for the most part EQ2 has done away with the term "No Drop" due to the fact that inventory items cannot be dropped onto the ground in the first place; a rather common EQlive practice.</p><p>Speaking of which, I miss my Mod Rods. Not for what they were in regards to game utility, but rather for "Mod Art".</p>

[Murchik]

<div></div><blockquote><hr>masburrito wrote:<div>The items from Poets Palace are still listed as " Lore No Trade." The only thing that has been changed is the Fabled to Legendary tag.  I know this for sure because I do play on test. </div><div> </div><div>Why do ppl refer to no trade items as no drop items?  Am I missing something or is it just a mistype?</div><div> </div><hr></blockquote><p>how refreshing to get a answer from the person who actually has an idea what is going on. Thanx</p><p>no drop/no trade = EQ1 addiction in action</p>

[KBern]

<div></div><blockquote><hr>Murchik wrote:<div></div><blockquote><hr>masburrito wrote:<div>The items from Poets Palace are still listed as " Lore No Trade." The only thing that has been changed is the Fabled to Legendary tag.  I know this for sure because I do play on test. </div><div> </div><div>Why do ppl refer to no trade items as no drop items?  Am I missing something or is it just a mistype?</div><div> </div><hr></blockquote><p>how refreshing to get a answer from the person who actually has an idea what is going on. Thanx</p><p>no drop/no trade = EQ1 addiction in action</p><hr></blockquote><p>lol you ask a question...get an answer, then start insulting people for no reason?</p><p>Grow up man.</p>

[Murchik]

<div></div><blockquote><hr>KBern wrote:<div></div><blockquote><hr>Murchik wrote:<div></div><blockquote><hr>masburrito wrote:<div>The items from Poets Palace are still listed as " Lore No Trade." The only thing that has been changed is the Fabled to Legendary tag.  I know this for sure because I do play on test. </div><div> </div><div>Why do ppl refer to no trade items as no drop items?  Am I missing something or is it just a mistype?</div><div> </div><hr></blockquote><p>how refreshing to get a answer from the person who actually has an idea what is going on. Thanx</p><p>no drop/no trade = EQ1 addiction in action</p><hr></blockquote><p>lol you ask a question...get an answer, then start insulting people for no reason?</p><p>Grow up man.</p><hr></blockquote><p>did I miss something?  I thanked the poster for replaying with info that they actually have an idea about</p><p>grow up? thanx, I will look into it</p>

[ke'la]

<div></div><div></div><blockquote><hr>KBern wrote:<div></div><blockquote><hr>Murchik wrote:<div></div><blockquote><hr>masburrito wrote:<div>The items from Poets Palace are still listed as " Lore No Trade." The only thing that has been changed is the Fabled to Legendary tag.  I know this for sure because I do play on test. </div><div> </div><div>Why do ppl refer to no trade items as no drop items?  Am I missing something or is it just a mistype?</div><div> </div><hr></blockquote><p>how refreshing to get a answer from the person who actually has an idea what is going on. Thanx</p><p>no drop/no trade = EQ1 addiction in action</p><hr></blockquote><p>lol you ask a question...get an answer, then start insulting people for no reason?</p><p>Grow up man.</p><hr></blockquote><p>did I miss something?  I thanked the poster for replaying with info that they actually have an idea about</p><p>grow up? thanx, I will look into it</p><p></p><hr><p>[Removed for Content], Magus's post WAS an answer the Probly modifier was just because he was only 99.9% shure they are not loseing the NO TRADE tag.  As the 2 tags are NOT in ANYWAY linked and the devs DID NOT SAY they were droping the NO TRADE tag. If someone with a year+ experance with THESE particular Devs makes an Educated guess as to what the Devs mean its a pritty good shot that its accuate. Does that mean that he might be wrong possably thats the reason for the Modifier. Most answers in life are NOT definate (especally in fields like Sience(if a Sientist says something is definatly the way he/she says it is either they are a bad sientist or a Hack doing it for thier Politcal/Religous beliefs or thier Sponcer's Money)) as shuch eventually you will have to get used to answers like:</p><p>Most Likly</p><p>Usually</p><p>Probably</p><p>Most of the time</p><p>etc.</p><p>Oh and BTW while Magus' is abrupt, anoying and trollish(at times) the really anoying thing about him is he is generally(another of those qualifiers that anoys you so much) accuarte with his statments and does answer the question, in a very anoying manor usually(another qualifier).</p><p>Message Edited by ke'la on <span class="date_text">03-08-2006</span><span class="time_text">08:39 AM</span></p>

[Rhianni]

<div></div><blockquote><hr>Murchik wrote:<div></div><blockquote><hr>KBern wrote:<div></div><blockquote><hr>Murchik wrote:<div></div><blockquote><hr>masburrito wrote:<div>The items from Poets Palace are still listed as " Lore No Trade." The only thing that has been changed is the Fabled to Legendary tag.  I know this for sure because I do play on test. </div><div> </div><div>Why do ppl refer to no trade items as no drop items?  Am I missing something or is it just a mistype?</div><div> </div><hr></blockquote><p>how refreshing to get a answer from the person who actually has an idea what is going on. Thanx</p><p>no drop/no trade = EQ1 addiction in action</p><hr></blockquote><p>lol you ask a question...get an answer, then start insulting people for no reason?</p><p>Grow up man.</p><hr></blockquote><p>did I miss something?  I thanked the poster for replaying with info that they actually have an idea about</p><p>grow up? thanx, I will look into it</p><p></p><hr><p>You missed where Magus told you that the no-trade flag isnt apart of the fabled part.  It even says it right in the patch notes.  Obviously you have a beef with Magus and came back hard at him which is what KBern was commenting on.</p></blockquote><p><em>- Items from the Poet's Palace that were previously labeled Fabled are now Legendary (though the <strong><font color="#ff3300">items themselves have not changed</font></strong>).</em></p>

[Murchik]

<div></div><blockquote><hr>ke'la wrote:<div></div><div></div><p>[Removed for Content], Magus's post WAS an answer the Probly modifier was just because he was only 99.9% shure they are not loseing the NO TRADE tag.  As the 2 tags are NOT in ANYWAY linked and the devs DID NOT SAY they were droping the NO TRADE tag. If someone with a year+ experance with THESE particular Devs makes an Educated guess as to what the Devs mean its a pritty good shot that its accuate. Does that mean that he might be wrong possably thats the reason for the Modifier. Most answers in life are NOT definate (especally in fields like Sience(if a Sientist says something is definatly the way he/she says it is either they are a bad sientist or a Hack doing it for thier Politcal/Religous beliefs or thier Sponcer's Money)) as shuch eventually you will have to get used to answers like:</p><p>Most Likly</p><p>Usually</p><p>Probably</p><p>Most of the time</p><p>etc.</p><p>Oh and BTW while Magus' is abrupt, anoying and trollish(at times) the really anoying thing about him is he is generally(another of those qualifiers that anoys you so much) accuarte with his statments and does answer the question, in a very anoying manor usually(another qualifier).</p><p>Message Edited by ke'la on <span class="date_text">03-08-2006</span><span class="time_text">08:39 AM</span></p><hr></blockquote>please tell me you are not the same kela that played/plays wizard in eq1, because you sure sound as dumb as she is

[Murchik]

<div></div><blockquote><hr>Rhianni wrote:<div></div><blockquote><hr>Murchik wrote:<div></div><blockquote><hr>KBern wrote:<div></div><blockquote><hr>Murchik wrote:<div></div><blockquote><hr>masburrito wrote:<div>The items from Poets Palace are still listed as " Lore No Trade." The only thing that has been changed is the Fabled to Legendary tag.  I know this for sure because I do play on test. </div><div> </div><div>Why do ppl refer to no trade items as no drop items?  Am I missing something or is it just a mistype?</div><div> </div><hr></blockquote><p>how refreshing to get a answer from the person who actually has an idea what is going on. Thanx</p><p>no drop/no trade = EQ1 addiction in action</p><hr></blockquote><p>lol you ask a question...get an answer, then start insulting people for no reason?</p><p>Grow up man.</p><hr></blockquote><p>did I miss something?  I thanked the poster for replaying with info that they actually have an idea about</p><p>grow up? thanx, I will look into it</p><p></p><hr><p>You missed where Magus told you that the no-trade flag isnt apart of the fabled part.  It even says it right in the patch notes.  Obviously you have a beef with Magus and came back hard at him which is what KBern was commenting on.</p></blockquote><p><em>- Items from the Poet's Palace that were previously labeled Fabled are now Legendary (though the <strong><font color="#ff3300">items themselves have not changed</font></strong>).</em></p><hr></blockquote><p> </p><p>i have no beef with the guy, you apparrently have some with me, I wonder why?</p>go go post count

[Murchik]

<div></div><blockquote><hr>Rhianni wrote:<div></div><p><em>- Items from the Poet's Palace that were previously labeled Fabled are now Legendary (though the <strong><font color="#ff3300">items themselves have not changed</font></strong>).</em></p><hr></blockquote>and this is not quote from magus if you haven't noticed, you may want to read who posts what before quoting it, I thanked the person who posted this reply

[Za]

Several people replied to your post with FACTUAL ANSWERS (100% facts) to your initial question.You <b>DID NOT</b> ask if any of the items in PP had been changed, which is what the laster test player responded to.Your initial was question was " DOES THE FLAG CHANGE <b>MEAN</b> A CHANGE IN THE TRADE FLAG ". Several of us tried to answer that question, but you obviously aren't that bright. The answer to THAT question is NO, the 2 flag designations have nothing to do with one another AT ALL. You're getting flamed for getting snippy towards someone that actually answered the question you asked, versus answering the question you were apparently trying to ask. Maybe you should learn to phrase question appropriately before you go calling anyone else names.

[Murchik]

<div></div><blockquote><hr>Zald wrote:Several people replied to your post with FACTUAL ANSWERS (100% facts) to your initial question.You <b>DID NOT</b> ask if any of the items in PP had been changed, which is what the laster test player responded to.Your initial was question was " DOES THE FLAG CHANGE <b>MEAN</b> A CHANGE IN THE TRADE FLAG ". Several of us tried to answer that question, but you obviously aren't that bright. The answer to THAT question is NO, the 2 flag designations have nothing to do with one another AT ALL. You're getting flamed for getting snippy towards someone that actually answered the question you asked, versus answering the question you were apparently trying to ask. Maybe you should learn to phrase question appropriately before you go calling anyone else names.<hr></blockquote><p>I love gullible (spelling [Removed for Content], sp?) people</p><p>how fast someone was to correct me, please tell Zald how to correctly to put a sentence together (hint to Zald: "Your initial was question was " DOES THE FLAG CHANGE <b>MEAN</b> A CHANGE IN THE TRADE FLAG ", is not the correct way to say what you were trying to say, but you know it and only can jump on other people if they make a mistake in a word/sentence/post).  And no, that is not how my original question was worded and it had different meaning as you are trying to represent it.  How about some classes in comprehension? ;o  To put it in simpler words for you it could be said : Are they going to take a "no drop (no trade)" tag of the items once they become legendary vs fabled?  See, it has nothing to do what the tag means, it has to do with their intention towards the items from that zone.</p>

[Za]

Yes, IF you'd asked that it would have been clearer.I don't need classes I got a A in English 101. Maybe if you had, you could have presented the question correctly in the 1st place!Or maybe if you hadn't got an attitude with the person that answered you, none of this would have happened.

[AzDragonLa]

<div>can't we all just get along??:smileyhappy:</div>

[Persi]

<div></div><blockquote><hr>AzDragonLady wrote:<div>can't we all just get along??:smileyhappy:</div><hr></blockquote><p>We could but some people don't like it when they ask a question, and Magus gives a 100% correct answer.</p><p>/confused:smileysad:</p><p> </p><p>Orontes</p><p>Assassin on Unrest</p>

[Echgar]

There is so much bickering in this thread I have little option aside from closing it.  Don't attack/insult other posters folks.<a target="_blank" href="http://eqiiforums.station.sony.com/eq2/board/message?board.id=faq&message.id=25">Forum Rules of Conduct</a><div></div>