View Full Version : Bye bye Mystic
I have 12 toons in EQ2. I have found that of all 12 the Mystic is the most useless. This class is broken. Its been broken since day one. The revamp did not fix the class one bit. My level 52 mystic is not fun to play and compared to my templer and fury she stinks as a healer and has the most trouble soloing. I dont mean any disrespect to the rest of you playing this class, because I feel very bad for how you are treated by SOE. You deserve better. As for me, the mystic will be retired or at least put way back on the toon pile until SOE finally addresses the key problems with this class. <div></div>
bmlava
10-22-2005, 09:52 PM
<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> Jakki wrote:<BR>I have 12 toons in EQ2. I have found that of all 12 the Mystic is the most useless. This class is broken. Its been broken since day one. The revamp did not fix the class one bit. <BR><BR>My level 52 mystic is not fun to play and compared to my templer and fury she stinks as a healer and has the most trouble soloing. <BR><BR>I dont mean any disrespect to the rest of you playing this class, because I feel very bad for how you are treated by SOE. You deserve better. As for me, the mystic will be retired or at least put way back on the toon pile until SOE finally addresses the key problems with this class. <BR> <BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE><BR> <DIV>Strange, I felt the same way about my 32 Templar. Deleted him, because I found Mystic much more useful. With Mystic I have found zero trouble soloing, or much trouble keeping my group alive (sans the old water spirit splat). I especially love it now that wards are a bit stronger. </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Ehh to each his/her own I 'spose... Good luck with the rest of your characters.</DIV>
Silda
10-22-2005, 10:18 PM
Bye, dont let the door hit you in the [expletive haxx0red by Raiscript]. <div></div>
BALTO
10-23-2005, 12:47 AM
i feel for ya, about where ya comen from, in total agreement. its just shaman line is a short an narrow one, only ment for the most diligent fan boys/girls. pets huge an annoying debuffs, not on par with others solo'n well.. some class has to be last, but by this margin? laughable wards still vaporizen way before spell experation, even on green heroic mobs wtih all lines of tanks. oh ya an debuffed just means little more delay to see it happen. little to no progression in spells strength all this hoopla about concentration slots an working out diffrent tatics with em, (this goes for the whole game not just mystic) is silly, least with shamans not much challange in filling out the only useage for em. regen that any dps fanatic or people that like to have free movement with no impariments, loath to have casted on em. kinda havnt play'd many other class'...but someone tell me that every class has a NEEDED spell thats always casted, have these type of impariments!!! off the top of my head, dont recall any cept the movemnt rate decrease on invis/stealth god soe hates us...an ya fan boys/girls that glorify just the littelest change does not help the situation. there's always a mickey mouse club member for a failed game, even after the plug's been pulled. <div></div>
thedu
10-23-2005, 12:57 AM
<div></div><span><blockquote><hr>BALTO wrote:i feel for ya, about where ya comen from, in total agreement. its just shaman line is a short an narrow one, only ment for the most diligent fan boys/girls. pets huge an annoying debuffs, not on par with others solo'n well.. some class has to be last, but by this margin? laughable wards still vaporizen way before spell experation, even on green heroic mobs wtih all lines of tanks. oh ya an debuffed just means little more delay to see it happen. little to no progression in spells strength all this hoopla about concentration slots an working out diffrent tatics with em, (this goes for the whole game not just mystic) is silly, least with shamans not much challange in filling out the only useage for em. regen that any dps fanatic or people that like to have free movement with no impariments, loath to have casted on em. kinda havnt play'd many other class'...but someone tell me that every class has a NEEDED spell thats always casted, have these type of impariments!!! off the top of my head, dont recall any cept the movemnt rate decrease on invis/stealth god soe hates us...an ya fan boys/girls that glorify just the littelest change does not help the situation. there's always a mickey mouse club member for a failed game, even after the plug's been pulled. <hr></blockquote>Wow, the fragmented sentences and little to no use of punctuation caused quite the eye strain/headache. I'm not quite sure where to begin, because to be honest I don't even understand what your saying. What does "</span><span> pets huge an annoying" mean? <span> <blockquote><hr>BALTO wrote:god soe hates us...an ya fan boys/girls that glorify just the littelest change does not help the situation. <hr></blockquote> </span><span></span>Well, I don't recall seeing as where your helping out fixing the problems? I like playing my Mystic, and I have no problems soloing, but not every class is comfortable for every person. </span><div></div><p>Message Edited by thedump on <span class=date_text>10-22-2005</span> <span class=time_text>01:58 PM</span>
bmlava
10-23-2005, 01:05 AM
<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> BALTO wrote:<BR><BR>solo'n well.. some class has to be last, but by this margin? laughable<BR><BR> <BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE><BR> <DIV>Someone please explain how mystic isn't a soloable class, or how it sucks to solo with. I have had <U><EM>no</EM></U> trouble whatsoever finding hunting grounds, gaining xp, or anything else solo. I also play a wiz, a troubadoor, and a 'zerker. I have a <U><EM>much</EM></U> easier time soloing with my mystic, than with any of the others. I had a harder time soloing with a 32 templar than I do with my mystic. </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Someone shed some light on this.... or just keep complaining with no actual fact to back it up as you usually do.</DIV><p>Message Edited by bmlavall on <span class=date_text>10-22-2005</span> <span class=time_text>05:07 PM</span>
Eepop
10-23-2005, 08:17 AM
Mystics are the worse at everything because BALTO said so, thats why. We could disagree, but that just makes us fanboys. <div></div>
icetower
10-23-2005, 12:38 PM
<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> bmlavall wrote:<BR> <BR> <BLOCKQUOTE>I also play a wiz, a troubadoor, and a 'zerker. I have a <U><EM>much</EM></U> easier time soloing with my mystic, than with any of the others. I</BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE><BR> <DIV>/Boggle</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>The zerker I am willing to take your word for since I've never played one, but if you can't solo with a wiz easier than a mystic you need some serious help.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>I agree it looks like the real Balto wrote that post, but I guess aid of the oracle is the huge pet that he is referring to, and that torpor is the only healing spell with negative effects to the recipient. The rest of it I'll get my german shepherd in to decipher.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV><p>Message Edited by icetower on <span class=date_text>10-23-2005</span> <span class=time_text>01:45 AM</span>
Ahlia
10-23-2005, 02:44 PM
<P>Hmm, I don't consider myself a fanboy/girl (too much of an old codger :smileywink: ), but I personally enjoy my Mystic.</P> <P>That is not to say that it does not have its drawbacks, I dont imagine anyone who plays a Mystic as their main could saythe class is perfect but it does just come down to personal preference.</P> <P>I have other toons that I play fairly regularly, (bruiser/ranger/rogue) and enjoy them all for different reasons but my main will always be my Mystic.</P> <P>Getting to know your character allows you to know what kind of mobs you can solo, and what group situations you can deal with as main healer as opposed to main assist. I have to say I was in a group last night with another Mystic close to my level and having 2 of us was pretty good for the group imo. One of us warded and assist healed, while the other acted as main healer - we were able to keep our team alive and in the green health wise for most of our encounters without losing too much of our own power. Quite a nice combination and one I would enjoy doing again.</P> <P>If someone does not enjoy playing their Mystic then then that is their choice and I respect that. Why play something that is no longer fun to you? Personally I will continue to enjoy mine with all the good and bad that comes with it.</P>
bmlava
10-23-2005, 05:31 PM
<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> icetower wrote:<BR> <BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> bmlavall wrote:<BR> <BR> <BLOCKQUOTE>I also play a wiz, a troubadoor, and a 'zerker. I have a <U><EM>much</EM></U> easier time soloing with my mystic, than with any of the others. I</BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE><BR> <DIV>/Boggle</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>The zerker I am willing to take your word for since I've never played one, but if you can't solo with a wiz easier than a mystic you need some serious help.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>I agree it looks like the real Balto wrote that post, but I guess aid of the oracle is the huge pet that he is referring to, and that torpor is the only healing spell with negative effects to the recipient. The rest of it I'll get my german shepherd in to decipher.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <P>Message Edited by icetower on <SPAN class=date_text>10-23-2005</SPAN> <SPAN class=time_text>01:45 AM</SPAN><BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE> <P><BR>Well alot of reasons why I'm not efficient at wiz soloing. Root and nuke isnt fun for me. Dont play wiz often enough to get the feel for it, and be comfortable. Spells arent up to where they should be. Equipment isnt up to where it should be. etc. etc. etc.</P> <P>I started the game as wiz, and it became 'unfun,' if you will. I have the hardest time soloing with my wiz over any other toon I have.</P> <DIV>Plain and simple reason: Wizard just does not fit my play style, so I have a hard time with it, even though I enjoy blasting things to smithereens from time to time.</DIV>
Stormbil
10-23-2005, 06:27 PM
<P>Anyone who can't heal their group well as a mystic after the CU is doing something wrong. I'm not sure how people can still say that their wards are being knocked off almost instantly anymore. My wards seem to last for almost the whole time. They rarely last for less than 15-20s unless fighting something many levels above our group. (ie orange to our tank)</P> <P> </P> <P>Not everyone likes all classes, but it doesn't mean that it's a broken class, or that the people that like/play that class are fanboys. There have been a lot of ignorant statement in this post, and I hope that people don't start assuming that they are correct.</P>
icetower
10-23-2005, 07:11 PM
<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> bmlavall wrote: <P><BR>Well alot of reasons why I'm not efficient at wiz soloing. Root and nuke isnt fun for me. Dont play wiz often enough to get the feel for it, and be comfortable. Spells arent up to where they should be. Equipment isnt up to where it should be. etc. etc. etc.</P> <P>I started the game as wiz, and it became 'unfun,' if you will. I have the hardest time soloing with my wiz over any other toon I have.</P> <DIV>Plain and simple reason: Wizard just does not fit my play style, so I have a hard time with it, even though I enjoy blasting things to smithereens from time to time.</DIV><BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE>Well next time you claim mystic is much easier to solo than wiz kindly include the caveat "wiz does not suit my playstyle and I can't be bothered getting any good gear or spells for him, " thanks.<BR>
bmlava
10-23-2005, 08:49 PM
<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> icetower wrote:<BR><BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> bmlavall wrote: <P><BR>Well alot of reasons why I'm not efficient at wiz soloing. Root and nuke isnt fun for me. Dont play wiz often enough to get the feel for it, and be comfortable. Spells arent up to where they should be. Equipment isnt up to where it should be. etc. etc. etc.</P> <P>I started the game as wiz, and it became 'unfun,' if you will. I have the hardest time soloing with my wiz over any other toon I have.</P> <DIV>Plain and simple reason: Wizard just does not fit my play style, so I have a hard time with it, even though I enjoy blasting things to smithereens from time to time.</DIV><BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE>Well next time you claim mystic is much easier to solo than wiz kindly include the caveat "wiz does not suit my playstyle and I can't be bothered getting any good gear or spells for him, " thanks.<BR> <BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE><BR>Not essential information that you need to have. Mystic is easier to solo than wiz. That should be clear enough for you to understand in the fist place. Next time you claim that wiz is easier to solo please include that it is that way for you, not necessarily for others. Thanks. [expletive haxx0red by Raiscript]. <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Ahh yes... and... My mystic didnt have good armor or spells and it was still easier to solo than wiz for me. [expletive haxx0red by Raiscript] off.</DIV> <P><SPAN class=time_text>And since you didnt respond to the question I posed, I'll ask again. Would someone please explain to me how mystic is not a soloable class? I have had zero issue finding hunting grounds, killing, xping, etc. I'd like to know how others are going about the act they are claiming is difficult. Or just keep complaining as you usually do with no fact to back it up.</SPAN></P><p>Message Edited by bmlavall on <span class=date_text>10-23-2005</span> <span class=time_text>01:00 PM</span>
paisan
10-23-2005, 09:01 PM
<P><BR> </P> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> Jakki wrote:<BR>I have 12 toons in EQ2. I have found that of all 12 the Mystic is the most useless. This class is broken. Its been broken since day one. The revamp did not fix the class one bit. <BR><BR>My level 52 mystic is not fun to play and compared to my templer and fury she stinks as a healer and has the most trouble soloing. <BR><BR>I dont mean any disrespect to the rest of you playing this class, because I feel very bad for how you are treated by SOE. You deserve better. As for me, the mystic will be retired or at least put way back on the toon pile until SOE finally addresses the key problems with this class. <BR> <BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE> <P><BR>Your joking right?</P> <P>12 Toons... does that mean 2 accounts 6per in various 2-box combinations?</P> <DIV>Also the number of toons you play helps you understand the game more only if you actually take the time to play them. Having that many guys normally means that you have not focused on their spells/gear or even learned their tactics. </DIV>
icetower
10-24-2005, 05:57 AM
<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> bmlavall wrote:<BR> <BR>Not essential information that you need to have. Mystic is easier to solo than wiz. That should be clear enough for you to understand in the fist place. Next time you claim that wiz is easier to solo please include that it is that way for you, not necessarily for others. Thanks. [expletive haxx0red by Raiscript]. <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE> <P>Lol not essential eh?</P> <P>Ok, heres a non contextual fact to match your style. My wiz can one shot some solo mobs. Since it is not possible for my Mystic to solo any easier than pushing one button and collecting the xp 4 seconds later, your claim cannot be true.</P> <P>To answer your pointless question soloing a mystic is comparatively slow, which is a far cry from being "unsoloable" (don't see anyone claiming that do you?)</P> <P>And I repeat. If you cannot solo a wizard more easily than a mystic ie kill more mobs in less time for the same risk then you are motor skills impaired.</P> <p>Message Edited by icetower on <span class=date_text>10-23-2005</span> <span class=time_text>07:17 PM</span>
bmlava
10-25-2005, 03:35 AM
<P>Your idea of 'same risk' is pretty absurd in your example. If you put that wiz and that mystic in a scenario with 4 yellow grouped non-heroic mobs, the outcome would be a bit different. </P> <P>Let us try this to put a 'same risk' example in motion (and I did):</P> <P>Zone: Sundered Splitpaw: Upper Tunnels</P> <P>Sub-Classes used: Mystic and Wizard</P> <P>Mobs Killed: All, non-heroic</P> <P>Spells: All spells upgraded to adept 1 or better. Master 2s, of course from 34 and 44. </P> <DIV>Armor: all upgarded: best mitigation available for both classes, stats on armor and jewelry - best available</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>--No totems or items used for health or power regen -- wiz spells used to draw power from health--</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Drink: out of combat regen 60</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Food: out of combat regen 103</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Rings: gleam of wisdom and flash of int (+11.9) for both chars</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Same quantity of mobs killed. Mystic finished about 13 minutes faster than Wizard. </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>To sum up: 'same risk' scenario. Comperable gear and spells. Mystic was faster in over-time experience gain.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>I'm sure you'll skirt the subject again, or question my motor skills... but in my experience soloing (by your definition: more mobs, less time) Mystic is easier than soloing (again, your definition) Wizard. I'd even say they are more or less even.</DIV><p>Message Edited by bmlavall on <span class=date_text>10-24-2005</span> <span class=time_text>07:44 PM</span>
icetower
10-25-2005, 05:05 AM
<P><BR> </P> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> bmlavall wrote:<BR> <P>Your idea of 'same risk' is pretty absurd in your example. If you put that wiz and that mystic in a scenario with 4 yellow grouped non-heroic mobs, the outcome would be a bit different. </P> <P>Let us try this to put a 'same risk' example in motion (and I did):</P> <P>Zone: Sundered Splitpaw: Upper Tunnels</P> <P>Sub-Classes used: Mystic and Wizard</P> <P>Mobs Killed: All, non-heroic</P> <P>Spells: All spells upgraded to adept 1 or better. Master 2s, of course from 34 and 44. </P> <DIV>Armor: all upgarded: best mitigation available for both classes, stats on armor and jewelry - best available</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>--No totems or items used for health or power regen -- wiz spells used to draw power from health--</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Drink: out of combat regen 60</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Food: out of combat regen 103</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Rings: gleam of wisdom and flash of int (+11.9) for both chars</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Same quantity of mobs killed. Mystic finished about 13 minutes faster than Wizard. </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>To sum up: 'same risk' scenario. Comperable gear and spells. Mystic was faster in over-time experience gain.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>I'm sure you'll skirt the subject again, or question my motor skills... but in my experience soloing (by your definition: more mobs, less time) Mystic is easier than soloing (again, your definition) Wizard. I'd even say they are more or less even.</DIV> <P>Message Edited by bmlavall on <SPAN class=date_text>10-24-2005</SPAN> <SPAN class=time_text>07:44 PM</SPAN><BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE> <P>I intentionally left out any detail in my example to illustrate the absurdity of your making broad statements without sufficient context and I even told you I was doing it.</P> <P>Thank you for proving my point. You just threw the rabbit straight into the briar patch. Shmuck.</P> <P><BR> </P> <P> </P>
bmlava
10-25-2005, 05:09 AM
<P>I rolled back to the previous intentionally. Skirt the issue more... or:</P> <P>So, now, go do SP with your mystic and Wiz. Prove your point of how its easier with wiz.</P> <P>Message Edited by bmlavall on <SPAN class=date_text>10-24-2005</SPAN> <SPAN class=time_text>09:12 PM</SPAN> <P><SPAN class=time_text>In case you dont understand, I put it in context for you. You should be able to proceed now.</SPAN></P><p>Message Edited by bmlavall on <span class=date_text>10-24-2005</span> <span class=time_text>09:17 PM</span>
icetower
10-25-2005, 06:12 AM
<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> bmlavall wrote:<BR> <P>I rolled back to the previous intentionally. Skirt the issue more... or:</P> <P>So, now, go do SP with your mystic and Wiz. Prove your point of how its easier with wiz.</P> <P>Message Edited by bmlavall on <SPAN class=date_text>10-24-2005</SPAN> <SPAN class=time_text>09:12 PM</SPAN> <P><SPAN class=time_text>In case you dont understand, I put it in context for you. You should be able to proceed now.</SPAN></P> <P>Message Edited by bmlavall on <SPAN class=date_text>10-24-2005</SPAN> <SPAN class=time_text>09:17 PM</SPAN><BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE> <P>Yep, you put it in context because I forced you to do so. Helps a lot doesn't it.</P> <P>I'm not gunna go do splitpaw upper tunnels because I have no reason to disbelieve your test.</P> <P>I will anwer with this. There are many options for soloing and you only have to do upper tunnels once.</P> <P>Now lets pretend for one crazy moment that there are simple choices you can make for the solo content you do that will maximise the strengths of each class. </P> <P>Pick a zone where restrictions such as mob distance and mob group makeup increase the likelihood of the wiz getting beat on and you're not gunna see his advantage. Mystic doesn't have that option, he is always gunna get beat on no matter what.</P> <P>Go with the wizard strengths not his weaknesses and you you will kill more mobs in less time than the mystic could ever do. </P> <P>As the sayin goes, you can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink</P> <P>I should go on jeopardy and make my special subject "the bleedin' obvious".</P>
bmlava
10-25-2005, 06:19 AM
again zipping on bye with no substance... Thanks for your lack of substantial input on the subject you acted as if you had some knowledge of.
icetower
10-25-2005, 06:51 AM
<DIV><BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> bmlavall wrote:<BR>again zipping on bye with no substance... Thanks for your lack of substantial input on the subject you acted as if you had some knowledge of. <BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE><BR></DIV> <DIV>Its not my job to spoon feed you "how to play your class" info.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Go to the wiz forum and look it up. Or doesn't that suit your playstyle either?</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Whats next, you gunna go toe to toe melee against a giant, get your [expletive haxx0red by Raijinn] handed to you and then go to the zerker boards and claim that on that basis your zerker is a better soloer than your wiz too?</DIV><p>Message Edited by icetower on <span class=date_text>10-24-2005</span> <span class=time_text>07:56 PM</span>
resus
10-25-2005, 07:08 PM
<P>you playing a shammy because you like it not because its useless, each class have an adventage on other, when im soloing with my shammy, i never go under 80 % HP with yellow arrow under. at lvl 53 i can buff for 1000 hp and over 200 on principal stats for soloing. Any group love shammy and is buff, ward is awsome, torpor + aide of the oracle give an awsome heal at low MP cost. Finally you playing Mystic because you love playing a Mystic not because is stonger or useless than other.</P> <P> </P> <P>Esio Mystic 53, Mistmoore </P>
Deathta
10-25-2005, 07:17 PM
lvl 56 Mystic and I have solo'd 80% from lvl 50-56 and have had a blast doing it . I have all adept III's and all pearl and cobalt gear . As 4 the guy with 12 charcters lol well let me laugh out loud again AT ya
bmlava
10-27-2005, 01:25 AM
<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> icetower wrote:<BR> <DIV>Its not my job to spoon feed you "how to play your class" info.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Go to the wiz forum and look it up. Or doesn't that suit your playstyle either?</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Whats next, you gunna go toe to toe melee against a giant, get your [expletive haxx0red by Raijinn] handed to you and then go to the zerker boards and claim that on that basis your zerker is a better soloer than your wiz too?</DIV> <P>Message Edited by icetower on <SPAN class=date_text>10-24-2005</SPAN> <SPAN class=time_text>07:56 PM</SPAN><BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE>You're right, its not your job. When you claim to have knowledge of something and then show that you have nothing to offer on the subject, shows that you just skirt the issue. You acted as if you had something beneficial to say on the subject, but you actually had no information whatsoever, just bogus retorts and attempts at personal attacks. I'm sure in your world, you're as high and mighty as you act.<BR> <P></P>
Slinkie
10-27-2005, 06:54 PM
<P>Speaking as someone with a 43 mystic and 30 templar (although the templar predates the mystic)...give me my mystic anyday. I love her versatility, and find that she is a true joy to play.</P> <P> </P> <P>Rudhi</P> <P>43 mystic</P> <P></P>
ecoskii
10-31-2005, 07:45 PM
mmm - interesting set of rants on wizzie v mystic - have a 57 wiz and 37 mystic - my judgement would be that i can solo my comparably-equipped wiz quicker (than just about anything other than a bruiser) given a free reign on location etc - but i would also view it as a rather arbritrary and irrelevent question <img src="/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /> why play a healer if you want to solo!!!!! By far and away the best xp-ing i have had though is with my mystic and any avoidance tank (including chain armour scouts and conj pets) - these combinations are unbeatable imho for chain pulling easier heroics all day.
thedu
10-31-2005, 10:42 PM
<span><blockquote><hr>cloudyspam wrote:mmm - interesting set of rants on wizzie v mystic - have a 57 wiz and 37 mystic - my judgement would be that i can solo my comparably-equipped wiz quicker (than just about anything other than a bruiser) given a free reign on location etc - but i would also view it as a rather arbritrary and irrelevent question <img src="/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /> why play a healer if you want to solo!!!!! By far and away the best xp-ing i have had though is with my mystic and any avoidance tank (including chain armour scouts and conj pets) - these combinations are unbeatable imho for chain pulling easier heroics all day.<hr></blockquote></span><span>There seems to be continued problem with people's understanding of EQ2. Any, repeat *Any* class, is capable of soloing. However, due to the fact that SOE has decided to essentially redo everything (re: combat upgrade) many things are broken for many classes. </span><div></div>
Karlen
11-02-2005, 06:55 PM
>>>when im soloing with my shammy, i never go under 80 % HP with yellow arrow under.<<< When I am soloing with my 41 mystic, I know that if I ever hit half-health, it is time to run. I don't really know how mystics do in a group as I don't group very much, but I've gotten to 41 by soloing and quite enjoy it. Pretty much the only times that I take damage are when I know I have the advantage in the battle and want to conserve power by not bothering with wards. <div></div>
guitarman1000
11-05-2005, 01:09 AM
i love my mystic class when im playing my alts i miss being him, I havent soloed that much with him so i dont know about that but when i do i seam to do it just fine. even my low level wizard can do more damage then my 34 mystic but i still have way more fun with him
vBulletin® v3.7.5, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.