Protection of the Oak (and the whole line of the various lvls of that spell)

[Treve]

<div>last night in a raid, I was asked to drop that spell because it didn't stack with a cleric spell...that was a first for me...anyone know anything?</div>

[slayerwarrior]

<div></div>nope that don't sound right.

[Dragonreal]

<div></div><div>it's partly true... the ac portion of the spell DOESN'T stack with clrs or any other hlr's mit buff, but the resist portion of it does.</div><p>Message Edited by Dragonrealms on <span class="date_text">03-05-2006</span><span class="time_text">08:35 PM</span></p>

[Treve]

<div></div><blockquote><hr>Dragonrealms wrote:<div></div><div>it's partly true... the ac portion of the spell DOESN'T stack with clrs or any other hlr's mit buff, but the resist portion of it does.</div><p>Message Edited by Dragonrealms on <span class="date_text">03-05-2006</span><span class="time_text">08:35 PM</span></p><hr></blockquote><p>but it's still worth having up...no?....i'm the highest warden in the guild (oh...and i think the highest healer), so would my protection of the oak override the other classes buffs?...and is that a bad thing?</p><p>just never been asked to drop a group buff before</p>

[Dragonreal]

<div></div><p>you'd have to check</p><p>1) if the clr got their latest mit buff yet</p><p>2) which of you has higher spell quality</p><p>and honestly I don't think you should be made to drop your buff.. it's not going to interfere with the other hlr's buffs and all dropping it does is open up another conc slot to put aspect on someone</p>