Plz let our single reactive heals stack with those of templars'!!

[Cranber]

<div>Oh, for god's sake, I really don't understand why they screwed with this.</div><div>Before the DOF, our single reactive heals stacked with those of templars' serially - didn't fire at the same time but it lasted anyway. I had no problem with this, seemed pretty fair. Our group reactives still works this way, but why not single reactives!!!</div><div>Any single reactive I cast on MT in raid is now just waste of power even when I'm the only inquisitor in raid. All I can do is direct heal, direct heal and direct heal only. I'm seriously sick of this. If there was another inquisitor then it would have made sense that we had to divide our jobs between us, but between templars and us? Come on!</div><div> </div><div>I don't want more dps, I don't want better utility, I don't want anything else.</div><div>Just let me do my job the way I'm supposed to do. My main heal is supposed to be the reactive heal and direct heals should be just means to support it.</div>

[menelaus109]

/agreed<div></div>

[Krelias]

<div>Personally, I don't know why we can't be made to stack with another Inquisitor.  Having two of the same class healing should be similar to two different healers.  Sure, we can work around it, but why?  I would venture to guess it has to do with the code.  At any rate, it would be great to make all healers stack equally.</div>

[Dragonreal]

<div></div><div></div><p>they probably can't/won't do this because then they would have to make wards stack like that (no biggy really I guess...) and regens too (this is where issues could crop up). Seeing as every druid has their m2 regen (most likely), and regens CAN'T be made to stack like reactives and wards can; in order to stack they would have to tick simultaneously (ie: your tank has first 375-400 hp /2s, next regen is layered on, 750-800 hp/2s, next regen is layered on.. 1125-1200 /2s.. and on and on) Now tell me that wouldn't get a bit out of hand at some point and then EVERYONE will be screaming to nerf the druids (they're already screaming to nerf furies as is, but yay for me they're disregarding wardens and I'd really rather they leave my pup alone heh). You also have to remember that warden healing = regens so aside from that overpowering amount of regen being stacked on, if you had 2 wardens and a fury doing that, each warden can stack on just their large direct heal regen (can technically also do small heal too but I'm too lazy to bothe rwith the math for that one as it lasts about half the duration of large heal) and bump it up by another 320ish-400 per tick.... 0_o that's an insane amount of hp/s. With 3 druids doing this it would be: 1545-1600 every 2s and I really don't want to think about if you brought 4 druids and stuck 1 in each grp or if you have a warden or even just fury in the mt grp and they do grp healing (druid grp regen is just as strong as their single target regen, and wardens get 2 other stackable group regens on top of that)</p><p>Also note that I didn't even factor in the direct heals for either a fury or the direct portion of the hypothetical 2 wardens stacking their large direct heal (would be like 1360-1400 [forget exact numbers] every 5th or so regen tick for 2 wardens doing it). And that's just ad3; idk m1 numbers for wardens.</p><p>Message Edited by Dragonrealms on <span class="date_text">01-18-2006</span><span class="time_text">11:11 AM</span></p><p>Message Edited by Dragonrealms on <span class="date_text">01-18-2006</span><span class="time_text">11:11 AM</span></p>

[Sphinx1975]

Slightly tangent question here:I believe our debuffs stack with other Inquisitors, correct? But our reactaive heals do not?

[Odysee]

<div></div><p>In answer to your question...some do , some do not.  The only debuffs that stack to my knowledge are Compelled Repentence, and Fanatical Vengence.  If you want to consider Scourge or Purifying Flames a debuff I believe those stack for damage but not the actuall debuff component of the spell.  Forced Compliance, Vitiation, and Sentence do not stack....if one inquisitor has master 1 of those spells and puts them up and another inquisitor has only adept 3 of them...the second inquisitor will get a "this spell would not take affect" message.  And out G-reactives do stack with templars, just not our single.  Which btw I think is ridiculous.  If our group version stacks why not our single ya know?</p><p>Odysee No'nobadkitty</p>

[kenji]

<div></div>well..at least Inquisitor has best heal per sec with the help of Convert <img src="/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" />

[pinkchicky]

<div></div>i completely agree with you Cranberry...sux:smileymad:

[Riversideblues]

well, i sort of like the idea that they dont stack, makes it more fair raidwise as to how many 'duration' heals you can have on a tank at any one time, but i would like it a lot more if they brought back how our reactive was better than templars point reactive, and vise versa with their g-react > our g-react, found it just gave each cleric more purpose in that we would BOTH have like our own thing-zurr@neriak<div></div>