Got the Lv20 Training, but...

[Sailormoon]

I choose the following one:Zhem's Bastion of Faith - An advanced form of Redoubt. As a bonus toRedoubt it increases strength and intelligence.I try to cast it on my tank, it seems only 7 more mana(str+1 I think) compared to Redoubt App3.The hp part I didn't remember, but from the definition of the spells,it's counted as Adept2, it would be better.However, the key point of these spell should be the bonus ofstrength and intelligence, but adding only 1 seems a bit too small.

[Gronker]

<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> Sailormoontw wrote:<BR>I choose the following one:<BR><BR>Zhem's Bastion of Faith - An advanced form of Redoubt. As a bonus to<BR>Redoubt it increases strength and intelligence.<BR><BR>I try to cast it on my tank, it seems only 7 more mana(str+1 I think) <BR>compared to Redoubt App3.<BR><BR>However, the key point of these spell should be the bonus of<BR>strength and intelligence, but adding only 1 seems a bit too small.<BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE>Not to sound too cynical or anything, but you got the spell for free and its better how can you justify that +1str is "too small" a benefit?<BR>

[MaddBomber]

<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> Gronker wrote:<BR><BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> Sailormoontw wrote:<BR>I choose the following one:<BR><BR>Zhem's Bastion of Faith - An advanced form of Redoubt. As a bonus to<BR>Redoubt it increases strength and intelligence.<BR><BR>I try to cast it on my tank, it seems only 7 more mana(str+1 I think) <BR>compared to Redoubt App3.<BR><BR>However, the key point of these spell should be the bonus of<BR>strength and intelligence, but adding only 1 seems a bit too small.<BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE>Not to sound too cynical or anything, but you got the spell for free and its better how can you justify that +1str is "too small" a benefit?<BR> <BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE> <P>Last i checked everyone paid to play the game, so he did pay to get that spell (game is supposed to be updated with content and bug fixes, hence the monthly fee.)</P> <P>Your comment to his post giving his opinion was lame.<BR></P>

[Gronker]

<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> MaddBomber83 wrote:<BR><BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> Gronker wrote:<BR><BR>Not to sound too cynical or anything, but you got the spell for free and its better how can you justify that +1str is "too small" a benefit?<BR> <BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE> <P>Last i checked everyone paid to play the game, so he did pay to get that spell (game is supposed to be updated with content and bug fixes, hence the monthly fee.)</P> <P>Your comment to his post giving his opinion was lame.<BR></P> <BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE> <P>And responding that way to mine is ... ???</P> <P>Your argument is since we pay $$$ the new spell we just got should be better?  Should I go about explaining how absurd that is?  Try argueing on balance or utility or comparison with other buffs, but because we pay $?  :smileysurprised:</P>

[Bobbubski]

<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> Gronker wrote:<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE>And responding that way to mine is ... ???</BLOCKQUOTE> <BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE><BR> <DIV>its called trolling... </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>please don't feed the trolls</DIV>

[RadricTyc]

<DIV>I don't think any of the level 20 training skills are a great improvement.  +1 str isn't much, but what level are you?  It might improve as you go up.</DIV>

[Beribo]

It was an improvement, ths they did not falsely advertise it. It wasnt a huge improvement but it was an improvement. And the fact that you think you are entitled to a free spell because you pay $$$... talk about lame.