T7 reactivs only for endgame ?

[Zahmekos]

Thanks for putting both reactiv right near the level cap. In t6 it was really hard to keep up with healing until you reached 54 and get your first reactiv. Now we will have a hard time healing up to 68Wooot, good job *fgI can't wait to start leveling my templer, which is still 60. Nope, just a reason more to not do it ^^<div></div>

[Supernova17]

1. All healers get their upgraded heals at the end of their leveling from 60-70.2. All specialty heals follow a 14 level upgrade path, as do most combat arts, spell nukes, buffs, taunts etcIt's great to know that you know everything about EQ2 and can flame Sony.Something to realize in the next couple of expansions that include level increases, we do not get new reactive heals from 71-80, but we would get new reactive heals at 82 and 84 respectively.The only type of fighting you'll need level 68 and 70 upgraded reactives for are for fighting encounters level 70-74 anyway. Hundreds of us breezed through 60-70 in a matter of days / couple of weeks with our 54 and 56 reactive heals, which means anyone can do it.<div></div>

[Zahmekos]

<div></div>Not all want to race to 70, you know ?^^The point was if its a good idea to continue with the 14 level upgrade path. Because I'm really dont looking forward to t8 with NO reactiv upgrade. It was not funny in t6 until reactiv update, I guess its not funny in t7 until reactiv upgrade, therefore the whole t8 must be funny with no reactiv upgrade^^It wouldnt be that bad if the level difference would be 5 level and not 2.<div></div><p>Message Edited by Zahmekoses on <span class="date_text">03-13-2006</span><span class="time_text">09:10 AM</span></p>

[faldorian viva]

<div></div><p>I suggest you first try to heal in KoS and then start to wonder wether you need your reactives upgraded so bad. Hell looking at the reactives... lvl 68 adept 1 reactives is worse then our lvl 54 M2 reactive. (if you didn't choose that one.... well different story).</p><p>Basicly first play the bloody game and then start to whine about the content.</p>

[Zahmekos]

<span><blockquote><hr>faldorian vivace wrote:<div></div><p>I suggest you first try to heal in KoS and then start to wonder wether you need your reactives upgraded so bad. Hell looking at the reactives... lvl 68 adept 1 reactives is worse then our lvl 54 M2 reactive. (if you didn't choose that one.... well different story).</p><p>Basicly first play the bloody game and then start to whine about the content.</p><hr></blockquote>Of course I get to 60 without playing the game *roflIf you have your reactivs at adept1, nvm.I just found it strange that we dont get any heals for 8 levels and then get 4 in the last 2 levels. But its prolly only me. I would have liked it more, if the heals would have been spread out a little. I mean the 14 level distance is not set in stone^^</span><div></div>

[faldorian viva]

<p> </p><blockquote><hr>Zahmekoses wrote:<span><blockquote> </blockquote>Of course I get to 60 without playing the game *roflIf you have your reactivs at adept1, nvm.I just found it strange that we dont get any heals for 8 levels and then get 4 in the last 2 levels. But its prolly only me. I would have liked it more, if the heals would have been spread out a little. I mean the 14 level distance is not set in stone^^</span><div></div><hr></blockquote><p>You kinda missed my point :smileyhappy:</p><p>What i ment was our lvl 54 reactive as master 2 choice is better then the lvl 68 reactive adp 1. So true, once you can upgrade it to adp 3 or mast 1 it is better, it still means our lvl 54 reactive is very powerfull.</p><p>Same goes for Grand restoration, at lvl 64 it is an option to get this to M2 quality and it gives us a good big heal.</p><p>What i ment about playing the game, obviously you know how to heal and play the game as you lvled from 1 to 60, but you can't have spend to much time healing in KoS or else you would have known that we can heal good enough in KoS even when our heals are from DoF.</p><p>I'll admit i am not very tactical or politicly correct when i said "play the bloody game", i aimed that at the KoS part of the game. I have solo and duo healed in plenty of groups now to see that the contend is very much doable. Does that mean i don't want a heal at the early 60's? No, i would have loved to see it be more spread out also, however i don't think we can't do our jobs because of it.</p><p> </p>

[Blast2hell]

<div></div><p>not set in stone, but it's the pattern they've been using throughout the game design.    What ya might of requested instead, would be for them to bridge the gap at 7 levels.  </p><p>I'm 68, and just now got Glorious Intersession Adept 3...which is an upgrade to Grand Interesessiong Master 2.   I didn't feel it was needed that badly, as it was when we got our 54 reactive.</p><p>I'm looking forward to 70 and getting the new group reactive and benefaction spell, but yet again...I don't feel my group is hindered by me not having them.</p><p>On the flip side....you can't have everything at an early level, then there would be no reason to get the higher levels.  </p>

[Xaax]

<div></div><blockquote><hr>Supernova17 wrote:1. All healers get their upgraded heals at the end of their leveling from 60-70.2. All specialty heals follow a 14 level upgrade path, as do most combat arts, spell nukes, buffs, taunts etcIt's great to know that you know everything about EQ2 and can flame Sony.Something to realize in the next couple of expansions that include level increases, we do not get new reactive heals from 71-80, but we would get new reactive heals at 82 and 84 respectively.The only type of fighting you'll need level 68 and 70 upgraded reactives for are for fighting encounters level 70-74 anyway. Hundreds of us breezed through 60-70 in a matter of days / couple of weeks with our 54 and 56 reactive heals, which means anyone can do it.<div></div><hr></blockquote><p>That is a very intersting point of view. Just how many levels do we really expect to see in EQ2? I know that I was supprised to see level 70 hit eq2 so quickly. I think SoE pushed some content every 8 months, Ill guess well see if there is level 80 out at Christmas.</p><p>I will agree that I have had no issues with reactives at all on any content. Our reactives seems to be able to keep up with the damage that mobs melee for 90% of the time, even on hard content. My biggest issue so far is our direct heal. Reactives will not do jack when you have 3+ mobs tossing 2k+ nukes or HT'n your tank. Tossing your direct heal on a tank that is taking 2k+ nukes doesnt do much. This doesnt happen ofter but it does happen. I really hope that SoE breaks from the spell progression they have set up and start giving us spells for the content that they are releasing.</p>

[MrDiz]

We have know what level the reactive would be given for a year and a half now. Almost all spells are upgraded every 14 levels and are good enough to do the job for those 14 levels. In fact if u get them adept3 or master they are often good enough for 28 levels.