PDA

View Full Version : The stealth reactive nerf, and the deletion of threads resulting from this issue.


Raistlan
02-26-2006, 04:18 AM
I haven't posted on this issue before, so first off, I'd like to say this mistake is incomprehensible, however if it's fixed in the next patch (any longer and you go from having made an honest mistake to being morons, you've [expletive haxx0red by Raijinn]ed over a third of the healers here) it's forgivable.What isn't forgivable is the utter lack of communication on this issue.  What isn't forgivable is not only not replying to any of the thread's on this issue, not acknowledging that it exists, but then DELETING a thread which had no abuse.  No ranting.  NOTHING THAT MAKES DELETION VALID UNDER YOUR OWN RULES.  Are you saying that we're not allowed to complain anymore?I'm not going to say I'll quit over this, or I'll quit if you delete this.  Why?  Cause I honestly don't think you care what this community thinks.60 Gimplar out.<div></div>

MadisonPark
02-26-2006, 04:23 AM
<div></div>I'll definately give SOE the benefit of the doubt, and Im sure this was a bug, and i also understand that its Saturday and the devs might be off etc. I cant understand why the thread would be deleted though, with out a word in about it. And some type of something, even just saying that theyll look into it would be great.

OlaeviaTraisharan
02-26-2006, 04:39 AM
The deletion scares me <img src="/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /> Makes me think that they really did mean to nerf the reactives.<div></div>

Nocaster
02-26-2006, 04:42 AM
<div></div><p>While I'm not 100% positive, they probably deleted it because there's already a thread on the issue here:</p><p> </p><p><a target="_blank" href="http://eqiiforums.station.sony.com/eq2/board/message?board.id=spells&message.id=7351&view=by_date_ascending&page=1">http://eqiiforums.station.sony.com/eq2/board/message?board.id=spells&message.id=7351&view=by_date_ascending&page=1</a></p>

Raistlan
02-26-2006, 04:43 AM
In which case, using their own precedence, they should of locked it telling us there's another thread and link us to it.<div></div>

Nocaster
02-26-2006, 04:50 AM
<div></div>I agree. Who knows, it could have been a trigger-happy Mod.

StarryEyedElf
02-26-2006, 05:04 AM
<div></div><p>A. I moved the thread to an area where it would be more visible to the people who might be interested in seeing it.</p><p>B. Don't create threads to complain about missing threads or "lock happy mods."</p>