Reverence not working?

[Donte]

<DIV>I have the adept.  Now it has been a bit since I tested this, but reverence was not working 2 weeks ago.  I even let my MT get down on health, at the end of an encounter.  Then immediately had him pull with heavy taunts while reverence was up.  I watched his mana drop, but no health was restored.  I tried this 3 times, nadda.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Anyone else have feedback on this?</DIV> <DIV> </DIV><p>Message Edited by Donte on <span class=date_text>12-12-2005</span> <span class=time_text>08:21 AM</span>

[Cowdenic]

<P>**REMOVED DUE TO INAPPROPRIATE CONTENT**</P><p>Message Edited by Raijinn Thunderguard on <span class=date_text>11-29-2005</span> <span class=time_text>11:07 AM</span>

[Torninn]

<DIV>Yea I have stopped using it because I can't tell if it's working. To me, it appears to be broken.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV>

[kenji]

<DIV>i casted on self, and it still heal me while i smiting or healing MT...the % nerfed tho <img src="/smilies/69934afc394145350659cd7add244ca9.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /></DIV>

[AzraelAzgard]

<P>An allready poor spell was nerfed even more in an update not long ago.</P> <P>Its off my spell bar I never see a use for it, ever.</P>

[Xerxess]

its a nice spell if you spot it on a caster but if the caster gets beat on enough they die anyway.

[Timaarit]

<span><blockquote><hr>Donte wrote:<div>I have the adept.  Now it has been a bit since I tested this, but reverence was not working 2 weeks ago.  I even let my MT get down on health, at the end of an encounter.  Then immediately had him pull with heavy taunts while reverence was up.  I watched his mana drop, but no health was restored.  I tried this 3 times, nadda.</div> <div> </div> <div> </div> <div>Anyone else have feedback on this?</div> <hr></blockquote>It works. It is just a crappy spell.</span><div></div>

[Donte]

<P>Ok, I re tested this last night and it is working. (Bout got myself killed doing it, lol)  </P> <P>Yes this spell is pretty crappy.  I only use it when I am bored now.  </P> <P>The only thing I can see much of a realistic use is for a button smashing MT that consumes large amounts of power.(I hate those kind too)  Having to rest because MT is OOP.  Course at lvl 50+ I am not gonna say anyhthing to them as that's how they play.(ooh, rambling) </P> <P> </P> <P> </P>

[Brutus2]

Also, the amount being healed from this spell is not being reported in the chat window like other heals do.

[Timaarit]

<span>I just figured why this spell is so crappy in groups. If it was any more powerful, think how well it would work in PvP where you cast it on yourself and heal by damaging others. I consider that to be yet another proof that this game is balanced to support PvP, not PvE.</span><div></div>

[AzraelAzgard]

<P>Exactly.</P> <P>Probably why Fury cant use their super ancient heal on themselves too.</P> <P> </P> <P>But atleast their spell works nicely in raids and normal groups.</P> <P> </P> <P>Ours you have to have whoever is the target suddenly chain cast all their highest mana spells to see any decent result, and if your in a raid oh no, no casting on your raid friends! group only.</P> <DIV>Spelling ><</DIV><p>Message Edited by AzraelAzgard on <span class=date_text>12-07-2005</span> <span class=time_text>04:23 AM</span>

[Timaarit]

Sorry Az, only spells I can cast outside group are my 2 direct heals and my single target reactive. I cannot use Focused benefaction nor Reverence to anyone in raid but outside my group. So we cannot cast it on just whoever and see results. So stop pitying your fury since your information is totally false. Your situation is by no means unique, actually no priest class can use their specialties outside group. Or can furies cast BitF? If you can, then you would be propably the only class who can. <div></div>

[Kendricke]

<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> Timaarit wrote:<BR><SPAN>I just figured why this spell is so crappy in groups. If it was any more powerful, think how well it would work in PvP where you cast it on yourself and heal by damaging others.<BR><BR>I consider that to be yet another proof that this game is balanced to support PvP, not PvE.<BR></SPAN> <BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE> <P><BR>You do realize that the spell can be programmed to perform different effects in PVE and PVP, right?  The game's engine supports that.  This was CONFIRMED at the first Community Summit and reported on several times since by various fansites.  Developers themselves have stated this.</P> <P> </P> <P> </P>

[Timaarit]

<span><blockquote><hr>Kendricke wrote: <p>You do realize that the spell can be programmed to perform different effects in PVE and PVP, right?  The game's engine supports that.  This was CONFIRMED at the first Community Summit and reported on several times since by various fansites.  Developers themselves have stated this.</p> <div></div><hr></blockquote>Well, Reverence works just the same in PvE as in PvP. So they haven't. And like said, I dont believe everything they say. They can as well be lying just to keep order by misinformation. What would you do if they suddenly stated that they balanced game around PvP and all skills work in PvE just as they do in PvP? That is why they might not be telling the truth. Also they have not stated that they had done that to any skills. So as far as I am concerned, they haven't.</span><div></div>

[Kizee]

<DIV>I am still amazed that they nerfed this spell. </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>It was almost useless when it was 196% and it is definately useless now.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>I don't evne know if it works anymore. I was duoing with a wizard friend last night and I kept putting it on her but didn't notice her health dgoing up any,</DIV>

[Elro]

<DIV>Only time I use it is versus really challanging mobs prior to pull as our MT is Just banging out Taunts from the get go.  Every little bit helps out while getting a mob debuffed and slowed.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Normally put up in this order.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Group reactive, Single Reactive, Magic Ward, Sanctury, Reverance, and Save Vs Death.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>The Sanctury can be removed if not fighting anything that has a stun.  But, On an average Parse within the 1st 15 seconds this saves for about 450 - 500.  Every little bit helps =)</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Elrohn </DIV> <DIV>60 Temp for Dissolution</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Nek.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV>

[Zabumt]

<DIV>I started using this spell more tonight.  It worked well on a well-equipped tank that wasn't taking too much damage.  After telling him I was using the spell and what it did, I could see his health tick up noticeably.  Combined with all of my other healing spells, I rarely had to throw in an instant heal.  I think this spell is made for your tank... not anyone else.  Specifically a tank that can mitigate/avoid most of the incoming damage AND uses some power.  Basically, a well-equipped tank in a group with a power-regenner hehe.  That is, if you want to see visible up-ticks in your tank's health while he/she uses power.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>My experiences were with a T5 full-fabled guardian and a T6 equipped monk.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV>

[AzraelAzgard]

<DIV>The Master one is 160% hp from mana spent.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>So leet!</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Not...</DIV>

[Kilaelya]

They HP its heals when it actually works need to show up under the heal filter for chat, badly <img src="/smilies/9d71f0541cff0a302a0309c5079e8dee.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /> So I can tell if it's freakin' worth it or not, lol.

[kenji]

the heal is required Templar use up 150 power or so and the target use up 1000 power to self heal 1600 hp (at M1) in 15 sec length.<BR><BR>BS.

[Bhee]

I have Adept3. Well, at 196% it was okay spell. Now at 140% it is completely useless - even on mages. Lets wait and see how it is changed after LU18.<div></div>