Involuntary Healer

[Xconqui]

<DIV>Does anyone know what does the Involuntary Healer spell ( lvl 35 ) actually do? When casted it creates a nice blue effect on mob, and it does not show up as a maintained buff/debuff, and no it is not a fun spell, I hope. I casted it on every mob pulled to group for approx 5 hours and saw no benifit ( heal or cure). Is this spell broken? </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>35 Templar</DIV> <DIV> <DIV>No new spells to look foward to, till lvl 37 :smileysad:</DIV> <DIV> </DIV></DIV> <DIV>Unrest Server</DIV><p>Message Edited by Xconquist on <span class=date_text>12-21-2004</span> <span class=time_text>07:32 AM</span>

[Xald]

<DIV>It appears to be totally broken and ineffective.</DIV>

[Auria]

<DIV>It isn't broken. It's a very minor regen that proc's under the spells conditions. I think at my level at app2 it regens 43 a tick. So, it is barely noticeable, but it is not broken.</DIV>

[Xald]

<DIV>I've used it regularly and never seen any green point increases that weren't accounted for by my other spells. Does it display like that or is it totally 'silent'?</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV>

[Auria]

<DIV>It displays, I always cast it right after Mark of Kings.</DIV>

[Xald]

<DIV>Are you sure its not mark of kings procing that you see? No disrespect but I religiously cast it entire night I got it (about 4 hours of chainpulling with few breaks here and there) and never once saw it proc off. I didn't use the mark line that night so it wouldn't risk tainting my testing of the proc rate I was trying to measure. </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>I just honestly never have seen it go off. </DIV>

[Xconqui]

<DIV>At first I was using in conjunction with Mark of Princes (Ap3), and I thought it was the Involuntary Healer spell was working, but actually it was the Mark of Princes procing for a 37hp heal. Involuntary Healer does nothing; it is not even a maintained spell effect.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>On another note, healing a 4khp+ tank with a 500hp+ heal is just mind boggling to me, does anyone else see anything wrong with this picture?</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>37 Templar Unrest Server</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>70 Cleric Luclin Server (399 AA)</DIV><p>Message Edited by Xconquist on <span class=date_text>12-22-2004</span> <span class=time_text>12:56 PM</span>

[Auria]

<DIV>        No, I'm quite positive. At level 48, I have 2 sub-60 heals that display over my tanks head, one of which, for 43, ticks even when the tank isn't hit. I'm not crazy, I swear. Now, even Gwynet can't claim our spells are broken enough to be sub-60 :smileytongue: </DIV> <DIV>        On the other note, I had a tank pushing 7khp (6.8k) and to be quite honest, my spells weren't adequately healing. My L49 Inquisitor counterpart, who somehow managed to find an adept1 for his tier5 heals, healed for 821, whereas my best spell was ~694 :smileyindifferent: We really get jipped on adept drops at higher levels, until the economy catches up, or someone finds a spot for me to camp adepts, I'm using tier4 and app2s. /sigh</DIV>

[weas]

<DIV>never saw involuntary healer do anything... not 1 tick or point of hp regained from using it for me.</DIV>