Combat Healing or Arch Healing Adept 3?

[Auspicio]

<DIV>I already have BoV adept 3 and am looking to have another adept 3 made either for CH or AH, so I'm looking for some suggestions as to which would be the better one to have made first. I plan on having the other made as soon as I get the silver/coral for it but for the time being I need to make a choice and would like some imput, thank you <img src="/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /></DIV>

[Gwynet]

<DIV>At the price rares go for, just sell it IMO.</DIV>

[Auria]

<DIV>     If you rely a 90% on your reactives, go for Combat Healing, as it's a better patch heal. If you find yourself starting a fight with reactives and direct healing through them, Arch Healing, to make the long cast/high power use more effective.</DIV> <DIV>     About the price of rares: on several servers (Guk being among them) there are people buying rares in mass quantity, then relisting them at inflated prices, causing others to raise prices as well. This somewhat shady business practice has caused adept3s to become virtually impossible to find unless you mine/gather your own resources.</DIV>

[ken]

<DIV>Rare's seem to go for 9g or so on Guk.  For artisians and such that isn't a ton of money.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>I would think all templars would be using their reactives 90% of the time or higher as those are the most mana efficient by far.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>I pretty much never use Combat Healing so I would vote Arch Healing.  I have a silver cluster myself and have been wondering what to make so I would like to see other peoples suggestions as well.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV>