PDA

View Full Version : Supplicants prayer (26 reactive heal)


DarganDivine
12-11-2004, 09:50 PM
<DIV>I was just wondering if this spell had been fixed?  got a palladium lat night and wanted to make the adept 3, but not if it was still broken, any info would be great, thanks</DIV>

Gwynet
12-11-2004, 10:02 PM
<DIV>It hasn't been fixed, so the adept 3 makes it barely better than BoV adept 3, for more power though. So up to you. </DIV>

DarganDivine
12-11-2004, 10:04 PM
<DIV>thanks for the info, that is kinda lame</DIV>

khrokh
12-13-2004, 02:06 PM
I got the ad3 version of SP at lvl 33 and it was a 18% increased heal over BoV ad3 (for 60% increase in mana cost) + some AC increase.Unless i'm fighting hard hitters i use only BoV (+intercession) at lvl 34.Actually before fixing SP they should fix the advanced sage books at lvl 28 and 29 so we can get intercession adept3.

Donte
12-14-2004, 06:53 AM
<DIV>Please fix this Devs. :smileymad:</DIV>

ken
12-14-2004, 06:00 PM
<DIV>This is one lame problem...I wish Sony would get off their butts and fix our class.  I'm still only lvl 21 so I got a ways to go but this really needs to be fixed asap.</DIV>

Ephigy
12-14-2004, 06:56 PM
<DIV>Yeah I'm 23 and I'm hoping it gets fixed by the time I get the spell.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>*not holding his breath.*</DIV>

Gwynet
12-14-2004, 07:54 PM
<DIV>Make sure you /bug it a lot. To show that templars do agree that there is a problem.</DIV>

Tinkletoy
12-14-2004, 08:24 PM
<DIV>LOL I have the adept3 version of both BoV and SP.  At level 26 and 27, BoV outheals SP.  <img src="/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" />  But it's nice to have both to toss on the tank.</DIV>

Gobbwin
12-14-2004, 09:49 PM
<DIV>They do have a lot on their plate to fix, sounds like many of the classes are broke in some way.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><A href="http://eqiiforums.station.sony.com/eq2/board/message?board.id=Newbie&message.id=63141" target=_blank>http://eqiiforums.station.sony.com/eq2/board/message?board.id=Newbie&message.id=63141</A></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Hopefully it won't be forever until we are fixed, but I'm hoping that in due time (less than 3 months ideally).  Has anyone heard an official response to this?  They might be already looking into it, they just haven't found the bug.  They were dead silent about the Creature Mastery bug for awhile and kept telling people that it was working, just rare drops, then they found the bug and it was fixed the next day.  Sadly many of these issues won't be found and solved in a day, as there are so many.  All in all the game is working well and we should be greatful for that.  I agree that this is a problem and needs to be fixed, thusfar I still have a couple lvls to go before this really affects me, but I do look up to those who are 26+ and have plowed through this problem as best they can.  Patients is all that I can stress, though I too am in no way a virtue of this, I understand SOEs position when I read through some of the other class forums.  When there are millions of lines of code, finding that one period out of place can take a while, especially when there are quite a few, how do you prioritize?  </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Is our class completely broken? no, it is very inconvenient and annoying, but templars can still do well at healing (though it may be an uphill battle at times).  Stuff that does not work at all is where their focus lies as it should, partially working is better than not at all.  Would you rather walk the 20 miles through the snow to visit your grandma this christmas or drive an old beater that goes 2 miles per hour, guzzles gas, but has a working heater?  I know maby not the best example, but it works...</DIV>

Gwynet
12-14-2004, 10:20 PM
<DIV>I understand that there are other priorities. It's the lack of any kind of acknowledgement that irritates me.</DIV><p>Message Edited by Gwynet on <span class=date_text>12-14-2004</span> <span class=time_text>09:20 AM</span>

Gobbwin
12-14-2004, 11:16 PM
<DIV>Well considering the sheer volume of problems, I'm not suprized that there has been no feed back.  It would be a full time job just to keep a status update of all the suggestions/bugs/fixes/upcomming patches/editions...  I agree it would be nice to hear more feedback other than the computer automated response from feedback submissions, but if that means that they would have to pull someone off of a team that was fixing the bugs...just leave em there and let them fix it, tell me when its done.</DIV>

Gwynet
12-14-2004, 11:22 PM
<DIV>Yeah, would be a full time job... Just why haven't they hired someone to do it?</DIV>

Gojobu
12-15-2004, 01:14 AM
<DIV>- - -</DIV><p>Message Edited by Gojobuzm on <span class=date_text>09-20-2005</span> <span class=time_text>07:53 AM</span>