PDA

View Full Version : good parser


Lovelessangel
12-24-2005, 08:41 PM
<DIV>I need a link to a good parser, and combat stats ain't doin it for me.  Anyone know where I can find a good one?  Not willing to pay for one either.</DIV>

Xalmat
12-24-2005, 08:54 PM
<a href=http://home.inreach.com/kai/EQCompanion/ target=_blank>EQCompanion</a>

Lovelessangel
12-24-2005, 11:04 PM
<P>i said good, not complicated.</P> <P> </P> <P>anyone have a good parser thats not overly complicated?</P>

Romka
12-25-2005, 02:53 AM
<div></div><span><blockquote><hr>Xalmat wrote:<a href="http://home.inreach.com/kai/EQCompanion/" target="_blank">EQCompanion</a><hr></blockquote>EQCompanion is only good for logs analyzing, ie offline parsing. CSM was good for online parsing, on the fly.. but its dead now. ACT - has all benefits of both these parsers, and is best parser i've see so far. You can get it here: <a href="http://home.maine.rr.com/eqaditu/ACT/" target=_blank>http://home.maine.rr.com/eqaditu/ACT/</a></span><div></div><p>Message Edited by Romka on <span class=date_text>12-24-2005</span> <span class=time_text>11:53 PM</span>

ivo.kirov
12-25-2005, 03:40 AM
<DIV>That's awesome Romka.. thanks for the link!</DIV>

Xalmat
12-25-2005, 06:51 AM
<blockquote><hr>Romka wrote:EQCompanion is only good for logs analyzing, ie offline parsing.<hr></blockquote>You do know you can do an <I>active</I> log analysis with EQCompanion, right? IE real-time, on the fly, during combat.

Godwrath
12-25-2005, 07:51 AM
ACT - has all benefits of both these parsers, and is best parser i've see so far.<BR><BR>You can get it here: <A href="http://home.maine.rr.com/eqaditu/ACT/" target=_blank><FONT color=#ffcc33>http://home.maine.rr.com/eqaditu/ACT/</FONT></A> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>It really rocks, thanks for the link.</DIV>

Romka
12-25-2005, 08:02 AM
<span><blockquote><hr>Xalmat wrote:<blockquote><hr>Romka wrote:EQCompanion is only good for logs analyzing, ie offline parsing.<hr></blockquote>You do know you can do an <i>active</i> log analysis with EQCompanion, right? IE real-time, on the fly, during combat.<hr></blockquote>Of course I know. And did you know that EQC s-u-x badly for real-time parsing? No? Now you do.</span><div></div>

Lovelessangel
12-25-2005, 10:58 AM
ty romka!

Nibbl
12-27-2005, 05:00 PM
<DIV>Tried out ACT that last few days, dont like it and I question some of the parsing numbers as well.  Numbers jump all over the place during battle, extremely sporadic, will stick with EQC, much better IMHO.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Anyway "to each his own" <img src="/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /></DIV>