Other classes asking that necro's get nerfed ;)

[schrammy]

<DIV><A href="http://eqiiforums.station.sony.com/eq2/board/message?board.id=testfeed&message.id=26962" target=_blank>http://eqiiforums.station.sony.com/eq2/board/message?board.id=testfeed&message.id=26962</A></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Nice discussion going on over there about our training choices. Other classes seem to know better whats best for us <img src="/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /></DIV>

[Calidri]

They can Kiss My Pooper, We have been waiting for them to make us useful for months...Now they havn't even done it yet and people are already whining...They should do us all a favor and eat their own heads =D

[Kirotaan]

It seems to me if tank types get taunt abilities (their defining thing) maybe we should get our pets as our master 2's I think thats fair but hey I don't know about other classes so i don't rear my head into their conversations and abilities. <div></div>

[MadBarman]

The problem with putting pets in as master 2 training options is it would make the other options pointless. Seriously would you even consider choosing anything else if you had the choise of a pet? <div></div>

[Dastion]

<DIV>I have to agree. I like that having a master pet is a sign of prestige.  The only person who looks up to a necro with a Grim Corrupter is someone below level 30.  Why? Because all he had to do was get level 30. As it is now, Master pets are a status thing among necros. Also, those taunts are a small part of them.  You give us a master pet and you effectively give us better offense, better defense, better taunting skills, and survivability.  A pet is a far cry away from a Master Taunt. And based on some of the tanks I've grouped with, I'd never in my life use "Tanks get Master taunts" as a complaint no matter what my case may be.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Also, I didn't see any cries for nerfs...just people saying that a freebie master 2 pet would be too much.  Maybe I just missed it.</DIV>

[Kirotaan]

I dunno.  if I had a master 1 pet already I would choose the master two pet buff to go with it <img src="/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /> very powerful <img src="/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /> <div></div>

[quamdar]

master 2 pets are more than likely not going to happen, they would be overly powerful and should stay a status symbol among summoners not the things that everyone has or atleast if they are smart they have.  pet buffs are enough for me when it comes to master 2 spells because there would be no point in not choosing anything but a master 2 pet unless you had the master 1 already. <div></div>

[schrammy]

<P>Well maybe its not asking for nerf, i should have chosen a better title, agreed.</P> <P> </P> <P>However, one thing I know: If the Wizzy gets his Uber Nuke free at MII, I should get an uber pet at MII to make it fair.</P> <P>Incidently; all the peoplewho are complaining about status and master pets, would be at our end of the table if they hadn't got them themselves. What i mean is, you have not done anything More/Better/Cooler dan me to get it, you just got extremely lucky. You would be right if you had to do a Super Hardcore Extreme Difficult version of the Heroic arena, SOLO in order to get it. I would not be able to do such a thing. And if you can, that makes you far better then me and yes you SHOULD get something for that.</P> <P>The only GT i ever saw on our server was from an [expletive ninja'd by Faarbot] asking 20 (dropped till 14) plat for it. No way i'm paying that for any spell or status.</P>

[molinaro]

<P>"Nice discussion going on over there about our training choices. Other classes seem to know better whats best for us <IMG height=16 src="http://eqiiforums.station.sony.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-wink.gif" width=16 border=0>"</P> <P> </P> <P>Err no.  That thread is full of comments by summoners saying it's a bad idea.</P>

[soibit]

wow so these people are basically asking to be a ^ lvl 50 tank and healer and in one? if the pet was master two i think it would have to at least be a single ^.... i personally have the ad III tank pet at my level (while thats only 22 on this toon i've been playing since launch with others so i do know the game). i group with a 22 assassin only and have no problems taking and keeping aggro with my ad III pet. together we have no problem taking heroics on our level or lower.... i was able to pick another training option at 20 instead of the pet and im very happy with it.  if i was offered a master 2 pet i would (hands down) take it, thereby forcing a "specialization choice" on me.  i say boooooo, no dice. <div></div>

[Dastion]

<DIV>I'm not sure how the under of overcon system works for our pets. I know that my tank pet has always been undercon and my warlock is normal.  I'm not sure about masters.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>As for saying that we'd be on your side of the table if we didn't have masterpets already... I don't even have a single master spell.  I got a Master Petrify when I was lower level, but since it was soon to be outdated I decided the money I could get out of it would be better for me.  Master pets are powerful.  There is a difference between having a nuke that hits for master 2 damage and having a sustained damage pet with Master 2 damage output and/or  tanking ability.</DIV>

[daneeq]

<DIV><EM>Calidri said: They can Kiss My Pooper...</EM></DIV> <DIV><EM></EM> </DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#ff0000>HAHA! I was having such a bad week at work and this just made me laugh.</FONT></DIV>

[lancekortesoja]

<DIV>They will smile once we /duel and win.</DIV>