Beta Spell Screenshots!

[MillsFairchild]

<div></div>I don't play a Warlock, but I knew you guys were lacking screens from the combat changes... so I offered to host them. You can thank Mastire for providing them.   They were taken August 11th on the beta server with 218 int. <img src="http://www.millsplace.com/eq/images/warlock/beta1.jpg"> <img src="http://www.millsplace.com/eq/images/warlock/beta2.jpg"> <img src="http://www.millsplace.com/eq/images/warlock/beta3.jpg"> <img src="http://www.millsplace.com/eq/images/warlock/beta4.jpg"> <div></div><p>Message Edited by MillsFairchild on <span class=date_text>08-11-2005</span> <span class=time_text>06:42 PM</span>

[Mastire]

<DIV>Thanks for hosting them, and its Aug 11th beta <img src="/smilies/283a16da79f3aa23fe1025c96295f04f.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /></DIV>

[SmEaGoLLuM]

Thanks for these screens.

[Deathspell]

<div></div>Thx a lot for the screenshots! <img src="/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" />Can anyone explain what the following line in the description of our roots means?<span>Upgrades to this spell reduce the target’s resistance to the full duration of the effect.</span><div></div>

[Thorv]

<div></div>I have one question: could you decrease your int to 130-140 and post pics with spells like noxious bolt, dark distortion and nil distortion? I am curious how hard will be hit lower lvl warlock. You know, not all have something like 200+ int <span>:smileywink:</span> Especially when it is hard to find good +int equipment in 30-39 lvl range <span>:smileysad: Well, at last not gray or green. </span><div></div>

[Crono1321]

Hey that's pretty cool that Dark Rumi is now increasing casting ability!  I think we are going to be hit a lot by not buffing int as much though.  Looks like more swapping of mana stone ---hex doll and ALL int gear vs. int/agi/sta/whatever.  Tons more damage from the AE's, dark pyre, and soul flay more than make up for the stuff that was taken away. <div></div>

[Mastire]

<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> Deathspell wrote:<BR> Thx a lot for the screenshots! <img src="/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /><BR><BR>Can anyone explain what the following line in the description of our roots means?<BR><BR><SPAN>Upgrades to this spell reduce the target’s resistance to the full duration of the effect.</SPAN> <BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE><BR>That means if a mob will resist that spell 10/100 times that with a 19% reisst reduction he will resist it 7.1/100 times. With a master 1 there is a 39% reduction

[Kven]

<P>Interesting, I notice that Devastation looks unchanged in duration and simply increased in damage.</P> <P>Still ticks same time too...</P> <P>Anyone else notice anything different?</P>

[KlausFlouride]

Greivous Blast even worth upgrading?  I haven't seen a screenie of the beta version yet.

[Crono1321]

<span><blockquote><hr>Kvenau wrote:<p>Interesting, I notice that Devastation looks unchanged in duration and simply increased in damage.</p> <p>Still ticks same time too...</p> <p>Anyone else notice anything different?</p> <div></div><hr></blockquote>Yea I think the description used to say 4 seconds in test but I guess it got bumped up.</span> <div></div>

[Sokolov]

Btw, was there any change to Dark Emanations?  Always felt that spell was sub-par, tho technically not broken. <div></div>

[Dae]

Dark Emanations probably got changed in the same way that Torment of Shadows did. I can't remember if they're on the same timer or not but they both have extreme range, a hideously long cast time, that double opening DD and the same particle effect. <div></div>

[Raminicus]

<P>I don't mean to be a jerk or anything, but if these screens were taken from beta, then doesn't the posting of them break the non-disclosure agreement?</P> <P> </P>

[Dae]

According to Sony the exact same spell data is now on test so I don't think it's really breaking any rules. <div></div>

[MillsFairchild]

<span><blockquote><hr>Raminicus wrote: <p>I don't mean to be a jerk or anything, but if these screens were taken from beta, then doesn't the posting of them break the non-disclosure agreement? </p> <div></div><hr></blockquote>Moorgard stated that they're allowed to discuss any of the level 1-50 spells, but nothing else.  This portion of the NDA was lifted when the combat changes went to test.</span><div></div>

[Nazo]

<P>Thanks and Kudos</P>

[Jan It]

<div></div>And what about Ice Flame? Slowing by 116%, are mobs running backwards now? <div></div><p>Message Edited by Jan Itor on <span class=date_text>08-17-2005</span> <span class=time_text>03:44 AM</span>

[Deathspell]

What's the deal with our invisibility? We got nerfed already? <div></div>

[Mastire]

<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> Deathspell wrote:<BR>What's the deal with our invisibility? We got nerfed already?<BR> <BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE><BR>Invis is identical from app1- master 1. I probably will be changed eventualy.

[Crono1321]

Can anyone post the stats on the buff Dark Pact?  It was our mid-thirties Vivid seal upgrade, and it was always up on my conc. slots for me since it gives more int than Dark rumination.  Thanks! <div></div>

[CyberZomb]

<P>Would someone be able to post some updated screen shots of spells from test if possible.  Also some shots of our new spells would be great as well.  </P> <P>Thanks! </P>

[Nazo]

<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> Jan Itor wrote:<BR> And what about Ice Flame? Slowing by 116%, are mobs running backwards now?<BR> <P>Message Edited by Jan Itor on <SPAN class=date_text>08-17-2005</SPAN> <SPAN class=time_text>03:44 AM</SPAN><BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE><BR>:smileyvery-happy::smileyvery-happy::smileyvery-happy:

[Mastire]

<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> cyberzombie2050 wrote:<BR> <P>Would someone be able to post some updated screen shots of spells from test if possible.  Also some shots of our new spells would be great as well.  </P> <P>Thanks! </P> <BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE><BR>Spells havn't changed since these ones, and we havn't gotten any new spell that we would use at level 50, so it was not posted.

[Arrowheart]

<DIV> <DIV>Beta Combat Changes 08/16/05 </DIV> <DIV><STRONG><FONT color=#ffcc00></FONT></STRONG> </DIV> <DIV><STRONG><FONT color=#ffcc00>*** Combat Changes ***<BR><BR></FONT></STRONG>- Traits, Tactics, Traditions, and Training spells, abilities, and combat arts have received a pass to ensure that they work correctly with the combat changes.<BR>- Heroic Opportunities have received a pass to ensure that they work correctly with the combat changes.<BR></DIV> <DIV>Posted by <FONT color=#999999>Ryan "Blackguard" Shwayder</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#999999></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#999999>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#999999></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#999999>Anybody happen to have screenshots of the new/revamped 10-40 trainings?</FONT></DIV></DIV>

[Mastire]

<DIV>Endow Energy got a sever Nerf: now at adept 3 it is 34 power every 4 secs for 60 health every 4 secs. </DIV>

[CyberZomb]

<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> Mastire wrote:<BR><BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> cyberzombie2050 wrote:<BR> <P>Would someone be able to post some updated screen shots of spells from test if possible.  Also some shots of our new spells would be great as well.  </P> <P>Thanks! </P> <BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE><BR>Spells havn't changed since these ones, and we havn't gotten any new spell that we would use at level 50, so it was not posted. <BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE> <P><BR>Ok, but would someone please post Dark Pact or any other INT buff spells that we now have available to us, because at this point with the screens available to us there is only Vivid Seal to buff INT (A level 12!!! Sorcerer spell).   So depending on how much Dark Pact buffs INT it looks like we will be losing 40 INT or so at a time when INT will be even more crucial.</P> <P>Also, exactly how many new spells do we get from mid 30's to 50 and how can not a single one of them be usefull? </P> <P>Thanks.</P><p>Message Edited by cyberzombie2050 on <span class=date_text>08-19-2005</span> <span class=time_text>05:33 PM</span>

[Mastire]

<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> cyberzombie2050 wrote:<BR> <BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> Mastire wrote:<BR><BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> cyberzombie2050 wrote:<BR> <P>Would someone be able to post some updated screen shots of spells from test if possible.  Also some shots of our new spells would be great as well.  </P> <P>Thanks! </P> <BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE><BR>Spells havn't changed since these ones, and we havn't gotten any new spell that we would use at level 50, so it was not posted. <BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE> <P><BR>Ok, but would someone please post Dark Pact or any other INT buff spells that we now have available to us, because at this point with the screens available to us there is only Vivid Seal to buff INT (A level 12!!! Sorcerer spell).   So depending on how much Dark Pact buffs INT it looks like we will be losing 40 INT or so at a time when INT will be even more crucial.</P> <P>Also, exactly how many new spells do we get from mid 30's to 50 and how can not a single one of them be usefull? </P> <P>Thanks.</P> <P>Message Edited by cyberzombie2050 on <SPAN class=date_text>08-19-2005</SPAN> <SPAN class=time_text>05:33 PM</SPAN><BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE>Dark Pact is part of the Seal of Dark Remination line, the only spell that gives us a small int bost is Vivid Seal. The other new line of spell that we got was Nihilism line of spells, just lower levels. we aslo got another lightning burst sell at liek level 14 or somthing. Nothing worth mentioning for a level 50 warlock.<BR>

[Fepp]

How upto date is this list now? I looked for another but most threads seem to be 50-60 Cheers! <div></div>

[Magiocracy]

<span><blockquote><hr>Fepple wrote:How upto date is this list now? I looked for another but most threads seem to be 50-60 Cheers! <div></div><hr></blockquote>The list is out of date since the changes to INT affecting damage two days ago. Damage numbers would be lower now. Not much point in anyone updating these though until things stabilise (ha!) in beta.</span><div></div>